Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: FTC requires TRUSTe to alter practices, pay $200,000 to settle deception allegations
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau allows purchase of group benefits company
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves joint control of Italian aviation business
    • ADVERTISING—C.D. Cal.: Cosmetics institute adds Lanham Act claim against tattoo trade association
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: LinkedIn users’ claims over alleged spam emails dismissed
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canadian executive extradited to face Superfund Site fraud charges
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: High Court passes on summary judgment standard for milk conspiracy claims
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Medical providers seek Supreme Court’s view on decade-old waiver
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Pharmaceutical company sued for denying access to drug for bioequivalence testing
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: “Prediction in antitrust is hard,” Commissioner Wright professes
    • ANTITRUST—C.D. Ill.: Affirmative defenses dwindle in prescription eyeglass monopolization case
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—Mich. App.: Award of $1.1M for jobber’s contract breach, conversion upheld
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Perkins Coie adds partner to Dallas office
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—11th Cir.: Remand of cellphone buyer’s claims against MetroPCS upheld
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—C.D. Cal.: Claims that Costco did not include country-of-origin labels on prescription drugs failed
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—M.D. Fla.: Consumer’s claims against timeshare operator fail
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, TOP STORY: FTC requires TRUSTe to alter practices, pay $200,000 to settle deception allegations, (Nov 17, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Morrison & Foerster, LLP | True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc.

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc., better known as “TRUSTe,” has agreed to settle FTC charges that it misrepresented its review and verification of the online businesses that participated in its privacy certification program. A p ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc., better known as “TRUSTe,” has agreed to settle FTC charges that it misrepresented its review and verification of the online businesses that participated in its privacy certification program. A proposed consent order also would resolve FTC concerns that TRUSTe perpetuated the misrepresentation of its status as a non-profit entity after it became a for-profit entity (In the Matter of True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc., FTC File No. 132 3219).

    As alleged in the FTC complaint, TRUSTe failed to follow through on a promise to consumers to annually recertify its self-regulatory program participants for compliance with TRUSTe’s privacy program requirements. TRUSTe certifies compliance with, among other things, the FTC’s Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act Rule and the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework for transatlantic data transfers.

    In addition, TRUSTe allegedly misrepresented that it was a non-profit entity, even though it had transitioned to a for-profit entity in 2008. “Some TRUSTe clients’ privacy policies continued to describe TRUSTe as a non-profit entity until fall of 2013,” the complaint alleged.

    TRUSTe also was alleged in a separate count in the complaint to have furnished the means and instrumentalities for the commission of the deceptive acts or practices. According to the FTC, the company failed to require companies using TRUSTe seals to update references to the organization’s non-profit status.

    Settlement. The proposed FTC consent order contains provisions designed to prevent respondent from engaging in the challenged acts and practices in the future. It also would require TRUSTe to pay $200,000 as disgorgement and to comply with various reporting requirements due to its role as a COPPA safe harbor.

    The proposed order would prohibit TRUSTe from misrepresenting: (1) the steps it takes to evaluate, certify, review, or recertify a company’s privacy practices; (2) the frequency with which it evaluates, certifies, reviews, or recertifies a company’s privacy practices; (3) the corporate status of TRUSTe and its independence; and (4) the extent to which any person or entity is a member of, adheres to, complies with, is certified by, is endorsed by, or otherwise participates in any privacy program sponsored by TRUSTe. TRUSTe also would be prohibited from providing to any person or entity the means and instrumentalities (including any required or model language for use in any privacy policy or statement) to misrepresent TRUSTe's conduct or status.

    Partial dissent. Commissioner Maureen K. Ohlhausen issued a partial dissent, opposing the use of “means and instrumentalities” liability in Count II of the complaint. To be liable of deception under means and instrumentalities requires that the party itself must make a misrepresentation, according to Ohlhausen. However, the statement that TRUSTe provided to its clients about its non-profit status was truthful at that time. Because TRUSTe accurately represented its non-profit status to its clients, TRUSTe cannot be primarily liable for deceiving consumers under a means and instrumentalities theory, in Ohlhausen's view.

    In response, Chairwoman Edith Ramirez and Commissioners Julie Brill and Terrell McSweeny issued a statement, noting that “one who places the means of deception in the hands of another is also liable for the deception under Section 5.” They explained that TRUSTe for years continued to recertify some of its clients that neglected to update their policies to reflect TRUSTe’s change to for-profit status and instead included the statement about the non-profit status that TRUSTe itself had disseminated.

    Attorneys: Jamie E. Hine for FTC. D. Reed Freeman, Jr. (Morrison & Foerster, LLP) for True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc.

    Companies: True Ultimate Standards Everywhere, Inc.

    MainStory: TopStory Advertising ConsumerProtection Privacy FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use