Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Four more California real estate investors nabbed in U.S. bid rigging probe
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Animal rights group has standing to bring California false advertising and unfair competition claims against foie gras producer
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Vehicle carrier service providers accused of price fixing
    • ANTITRUST—D. Conn.: Former parent of bankrupt defendant not joined in commercial paper price fixing case
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC settlements ban sale of work-at-home business opportunities
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Mortgage refinancer to pay $7.5 million for do not call violations
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D. Colo.: Tortious interference, trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition claims proceed
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D. Kan. Bankr.: Claims for recovery of funds from insurance agency franchisees not subject to arbitration
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Antitrust Division attorneys Allen P. Grunes and Maurice E. Stucke join GeyerGorey
    • RICO—N.D. Ind.: RICO claims over alleged toxic waste dumping fail against seat manufacturer due to lack of enterprise, pattern of racketeering activity
    • RICO—S.D. Tex.: RICO claims proceed against construction contractor allegedly involved in bribery of school district official
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, TOP STORY—Four more California real estate investors nabbed in U.S. bid rigging probe, (Jun 27, 2013)

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    Felony charges were filed today in the federal district court in Oakland, California against four real estate investors for conspiring to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California. The four indiv ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    Felony charges were filed today in the federal district court in Oakland, California against four real estate investors for conspiring to rig bids and commit mail fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California. The four individuals have agreed to plead guilty to the charges set out in the separate two-count felony informations (U.S. v. Stan Kahan, CR13-00412; U.S. v. Wesley Barta, CR13-00413; U.S. v. Irma Galvez, CR 13-00414; U.S. v. Joseph Vesce, CR13-00415).

    To date, as a result of the Justice Department’s ongoing antitrust investigations into bid rigging and fraud at public real estate foreclosure auctions in Northern California, 35 individuals, including the latest defendants—Wesley Barta, Joseph Vesce, Irma Galvez, and Stan Kahan—have agreed to plead or have pleaded guilty.

    Two of the defendants, Barta of Oakland and Vesce of San Francisco, were charged with conspiring to rig bids at public real estate foreclosure auctions in California's Contra Costa County. They also were charged with conspiring to use the mail to carry out a scheme to fraudulently acquire title to selected Contra Costa County properties sold at public auctions, to make and receive payoffs, and to divert money to co-conspirators that would have gone to mortgage holders and others by holding second, private auctions open only to members of the conspiracy. The challenged conduct took place between June 2008 and January 2011.

    The other two defendants, Galvez of Pacheco and Kahan of Berkeley, have agreed to plead guilty to conspiring to rig bids at Alameda County real estate auctions from November 2008 through May 2010. During that same period, these individuals also were involved in a conspiracy to commit mail fraud, according to the charges.

    The Department of Justice Antitrust Division alleges that the primary purpose of the conspiracies was to suppress and restrain competition and to conceal payoffs in order to obtain selected real estate offered at Alameda and Contra Costa County public foreclosure auctions at non-competitive prices.

    “These conspirators manipulated and suppressed the competitive process through their fraudulent and collusive conduct to the detriment of lenders and distressed homeowners,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division. “The Antitrust Division will continue to pursue those responsible for these illegal activities.”

    MainStory: TopStory Antitrust AntitrustDivisionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use