Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—5th Cir.: Principal not immune from teacher’s First Amendment claims over pre-attendance prayer ban
    • AI NEWS—Two cases demonstrate potential perils of AI use in the practice of law
    • DISCRIMINATION—D.D.C.: Retired former director of administration at NLRB fails to advance bias claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—E.D. Pa.: Executive failed to show elimination of her position was due to her long COVID
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Md.: Health care center in the clear as threat of discipline is not adverse employment action
    • EEOC NEWS—Employers pay over $345K for religious discrimination, sexual harassment; new ADA lawsuit announced
    • EVIDENCE, DISCOVERY—D. Or.: Court rejects privilege claim, orders fired Shriners employee to disclose text messages with former coworkers
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Aliens, conspiracies, and ping-pong: Lessons learned from the 2026 Oscar nominees
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Massachusetts employers' top four compliance steps for 2026
    • PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—4th Cir.: Putative class claimants in defined contribution plan sought ‘individualized’ monetary relief
    • PROCEDURE—11th Cir.: Hurricane-related mail delay justifies equitable tolling for employment discrimination plaintiff
    • SURVEYS—HR leaders report AI-generated applications are slowing hiring
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, SURVEYS—HR leaders report AI-generated applications are slowing hiring, (Mar 11, 2026)

    By WK Editorial Staff

    According to a recent survey, 67 percent of HR leaders report that AI-generated applications are slowing the hiring process.

    As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes hiring, organizations are finding it more difficult—and time-consuming— ...

    By WK Editorial Staff

    According to a recent survey, 67 percent of HR leaders report that AI-generated applications are slowing the hiring process.

    As artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes hiring, organizations are finding it more difficult—and time-consuming—to identify skilled talent. A survey from a talent solutions and business consulting firm found that 67 percent of U.S. HR leaders say reviewing AI-generated applications has slowed the hiring process, with 20 percent reporting delays of more than 2 weeks.

    AI adds complexity to hiring. The rapid rise in the use of AI tools by job seekers is creating new challenges for employers. Sixty five percent of hiring managers report that a surge in applications—many enhanced or generated by AI—has increased the difficulty of verifying candidate skills. In some cases, generative AI tools are fabricating or embellishing work history and skills, making it harder for employers to distinguish authentic experience from AI-generated content. In a market where highly skilled talent is already scarce, this adds time, risk and cost to hiring.

    Notably, HR leaders feel the strain, as 84 percent say their teams are experiencing heavier workloads. To validate candidates, many leaders have added steps that can further extend hiring timelines, including:

    • Spending more time reviewing applications (42 percent);

    • Increasing the number of interviews per candidate (38 percent); and

    • Updating job descriptions to discourage generic AI-generated responses (32 percent).

    "AI has transformed hiring at every stage," said Dawn Fay, operational president of Robert Half. "Companies are looking to hire, but a surge in unverified applications is extending timelines and delaying critical work."

    How can companies cut through the AI noise? As organizations look for ways to maintain hiring speed and accuracy, many are turning to external partners. Two-thirds of respondents (67 percent) say they are using staffing firms for hiring support, and 89 percent report that those partners have been effective in addressing AI-related hiring challenges, primarily by:

    • Leveraging advanced tools to help verify candidate materials;

    • Conducting targeted skills assessments; and

    • Delivering pre-evaluated, specialized talent quickly for high-priority roles.

    "The findings underscore the continued importance of human expertise in assessing talent and reducing hiring risk," Fay added. "AI has made it easier to generate applications, but it hasn't made it easier to identify the right talent. In many cases, it's doing the opposite—increasing the need for trusted experts who can validate skills and deliver qualified candidates quickly."

    News: Surveys Reports AINews IndustryNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use