Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Teacher fired after Facebook post about Charlie Kirk’s death files suit
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—N.D.N.Y.: Nonbinary employee who voluntarily resigned unable to show adverse employment action
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—S.D. Ind.: Female county employee passed over for executive director position moves forward with suit
    • EEOC NEWS—New lawsuits allege pregnancy, age discrimination; $80K recovered in religious discrimination settlement
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Employer cheat sheet for workplace laws taking effect in October 2025
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—From English proficiency to drug testing: 4 bills pending in Congress could drive big changes in trucking
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—Treasury Department issues notice of proposed rulemaking on occupations included in tip tax deduction
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—D. Colo.: Government employee, targeted for layoff after associating with Latino group, gets TRO
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • REPORTS—GAO describes implementation, oversight of AI use in the federal government
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Fed cuts interest rate target, ignores tariff effects on inflation
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—D. Mass.: Class certification denied in car rental manager’s overtime pay dispute
    • WAGE-HOUR—MINIMUM WAGE—D. Utah: Domino’s franchise prevails against delivery drivers’ minimum wage claim on summary judgment
    • WORTH NOTING—Appeals court cases of note
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, REPORTS—GAO describes implementation, oversight of AI use in the federal government, (Sep 19, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Government Accountability Office

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The GAO identified 94 AI-related requirements that were government-wide or had government-wide implications.

    Ten executive branch oversight groups have a role in the use of artificial intelligence by the federal government, according to a report by th ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The GAO identified 94 AI-related requirements that were government-wide or had government-wide implications.

    Ten executive branch oversight groups have a role in the use of artificial intelligence by the federal government, according to a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO). The report details the current AI-related requirements in law, executive orders, and guidance, as well as the roles and responsibilities of AI oversight and advisory groups.

    Federal adoption of AI. Because of the rapid growth in capabilities and widespread adoption of AI, the federal government has taken action to counter risks posed by AI to individuals, groups, organizations, communities, society, and the environment. Federal laws, executive orders (EOs), and related guidance include various AI-related requirements to which federal offices and agencies must adhere. An October 2023 EO by President Biden (EO 14110) included more than 100 requirements for federal agencies. President Trump rescinded EO 14110 in January 2025; subsequently, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released two new memoranda to guide agencies in accelerating their adoption of AI.

    Audit. To address its first objective—to describe federal agencies’ current AI-related requirements in laws, executive orders, and guidance—the GAO reviewed five AI-related laws, six EOs, and three guidance documents that included requirements for federal agencies. The requirements selected were current at the time of the GAO’s review and were government-wide in scope or had government-wide implications. To address its second objective—to describe the roles and responsibilities of AI oversight and advisory groups—the GAO reviewed laws, EOs, agency documentation, charters, and websites to identify and describe the roles and responsibilities of these oversight and advisory groups. The GAO conducted the audit from November 2024 to September 2025.

    Findings. The GAO identified 94 AI-related requirements that were government-wide or had government-wide implications. For example, the General Services Administration is required to create an AI Center of Excellence, which affects the entire federal government. The report provides details regarding the 94 requirements, parties responsible for compliance, and frequency of the requirements. Additionally, the GAO found that ten executive branch oversight and advisory groups—such as the National AI Advisory Committee and the National AI Initiative Office—have a role in the implementation and oversight of AI in the federal government. The report details how each group was established, its position within the federal government, membership, and the responsibilities it has in the implementation of AI in the federal government.

    News: Reports AgencyNews PublicEmployees AINews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use