Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—5th Cir.: Fired Black city manager met requirements of Section 1983, not Section 1981
    • CONTRACT CLAIMS—E.D. La.: Employer’s claim survives dismissal despite withdrawal of tortious interference allegations
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—D. Mass.: Agreement’s 300-day deadline for filing demand to arbitrate ADEA claim was invalid
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—D. Md.: Nursing home LPN, allegedly harassed, reassigned, and fired after leg amputation, survives motion to dismiss
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—S.D. Tex.: Judgment granted in favor of franchisor in suit alleging religious discrimination
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—M.D. Fla.: Female employee, repeatedly hugged after breast surgery, stated hostile environment, battery claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—W.D. Pa.: Employee fired after leaving work early due to conflicts with Santeria religion advances bias, accommodation claims
    • EEOC NEWS—New lawsuits allege age, disability, pregnancy, religious, sex discrimination; third-party action no defense
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—From joint employers to oyster shuckers: DOL issues opinion letters on hospitality sector wage issues
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—How the government shutdown affects your business and legal cases
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—N.D. Ill.: Dismissal granted in challenge to Illinois Worker Freedom of Speech Act
    • LABOR—UNIONS, UNION MEMBERS—6th Cir.: Employee failed to show union breached duty of fair representation by refusing to grieve termination
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—Backlash follows reports Trump administration is considering not paying furloughed federal workers back pay
    • SENATE NEWS—HELP Committee to vote on NLRB and DOL nominees tomorrow
    • SENATE NEWS—Senate confirms Trump’s nominees for EEOC member and DOL solicitor roles
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—Backlash follows reports Trump administration is considering not paying furloughed federal workers back pay, (Oct 8, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Leaked contents of a draft memo gave a heads-up that the OMB is considering the possibility of the government not paying the workers furloughed as a result of the shutdown.

    Interest groups and politicians on both sides of the aisle are responding nega ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Leaked contents of a draft memo gave a heads-up that the OMB is considering the possibility of the government not paying the workers furloughed as a result of the shutdown.

    Interest groups and politicians on both sides of the aisle are responding negatively to the report that the government might not pay furloughed federal workers back pay once the shutdown ends.

    Members of both political parties are pointing to the Government Employees Fair Treatment Act (the Act), which was enacted in 2019 under similar circumstances and amended 31 U.S.C. 1341 by adding subsections (c)(1) through (c)(3). Subsection (c)(2) states, in part, that “Each employee of the United States Government or of a District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the lapse in appropriations.”

    Settled law. Senator Susan Collins (R-Me.), for one, has called this an issue that was already “settled” by the 2019 law and her sentiment has been echoed by Democrats as well, who note that Trump himself signed the 2019 law and that it is clear on this issue.

    Responding to the reports that the White House is considering withholding back pay from furloughed federal employees, AFGE has also issued this statement: “The frivolous argument that federal employees are not guaranteed backpay under the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act is an obvious misinterpretation of the law. It is also inconsistent with the Trump administration’s own guidance from mere days ago, which clearly and correctly states that furloughed employees will receive retroactive pay for the time they were out of work as quickly as possible once the shutdown is over.”

    OMB guidance. In that guidance, issued on September 28, 2025, the question of pay for furloughed employees was addressed specifically and answered affirmatively with citation to the Act: “Yes. After the lapse in appropriations has ended, employees who were furloughed as the result of the lapse will receive retroactive pay for those furlough periods. (See 31 U.S.C. 1341(c)(2).)”

    However, some have noted that the Frequently Asked Questions portion of that guidance was quickly, and quietly, revised on October 3, 2025, in an attempt to support the new interpretation being offered by the Trump administration. Some Republican legislators are starting to similarly question whether payment is required.

    News: EconomicNews AgencyNews PublicEmployees WhiteHouseNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use