Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—3d Cir.: EFAA does not cover former CVS supervisor’s harassment claims, formation questions remain
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—5th Cir.: Shriners employees fired for refusing COVID vaccine can’t revive dismissed claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—PAY—6th Cir.: School psychologist, offered less pay than male colleague, did not establish discrimination
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Plaintiff’s attorney fee recovery slashed in half even after Massachusetts trial win: A lesson for employers
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Website tracking without notice leads to class action lawsuit
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—N.D. Ill.: School employee, fired after complaining about drag show, advances free speech claim
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuit targets Trump administration’s dismantling of Social Security Administration
    • MSPB NEWS—FAQs seek to shed light on treatment of appeals during the MSPB’s lack of quorum
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—According to AFGE lawsuit, new Fork offers have gone out
    • SENATE NEWS—Bipartisan vote passes joint resolution effectually repealing tariffs on Canada
    • SUPREME COURT NEWS—Court rules in favor of truck driver who lost his job after failed drug test caused by CBD product use
    • USERRA, VETERANS—N.D. Ill.: Returning servicemember’s failure-to-accommodate disability claim may proceed to trial
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—According to AFGE lawsuit, new Fork offers have gone out, (Apr 3, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:AFL-CIO | American Federation of Government Employees | Office of Personnel Management | U.S. Department of Defense

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    As of the time that AFGE amended their complaint, employees at the SBA, DOD, and the U.S. Agency for Global Media had received either an email or memo regarding the “deferred resignation program.”

    In an amended opinion filed in the lawsu ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    As of the time that AFGE amended their complaint, employees at the SBA, DOD, and the U.S. Agency for Global Media had received either an email or memo regarding the “deferred resignation program.”

    In an amended opinion filed in the lawsuit brought in early February by the American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, against the Office of Personnel Management, the AFGE alleges that the Fork program has been “reopened” for employees of three agencies—USAGM, SBA, and the DOD.

    USAGM employees, they allege, received a mass email on March 28, 2025, offering them the same terms and with the same OPM FAQs as the Fork program previously offered to other federal workers. The email, a copy of which is included in the complaint, was sent from “HR Customer Service” and states that the program will be available through April 9, 2025.

    SBA workers received a similar email on March 29, 2025, the complaint alleges, including a copy of the email, and states that the offer is available through April 7. It also states there “will be no extensions.”

    DOD also announced the opening of the Fork, via a memo, the amended complaint alleges, citing a news story on the U.S. Department of Defense’s website.

    The complaint states:

    • “No new analysis, no new reasoning, no new justifications, and certainly no notice and comment accompanied these targeted re-openings of the Fork Directive. Nor was there any recognition that these re-openings again contradicted the terms of OPM’s first Fork Directive, which compelled workers to accept the Fork under threat that it would only remain open for nine days. Indeed, the fact that the announcements were released by each agency shows OPM knew it acted unlawfully when it implemented and released the Fork Directive the first time.”

    “Other mass layoff programs are also in the works,” the complaint contends. “There is no reason to believe that any will comply with the APA or other legal requirements.”

    News: PublicEmployees AgencyNews Layoffs Discharge

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use