Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK—D. Nev.: Including images of mark and inferring comparison is sufficient for pleading
    • PATENT—S.D. Cal.: Restaurant software providers can pursue patent misuse defense against $45 million royalty claim
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—D. Del.: Motion for restraining order denied in pasta trade secrets case
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—E.D. Pa.: Azurity Pharmaceuticals granted preliminary injunction against former employee, competitor
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: ‘BLUEBIRD HARDWATER’ marks properly denied registration over conflict with ‘BLUEBIRD DISTILLING’
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—W.D. Ky.: Motion to amend a trademark infringement complaint over law firm marketing imagery and slogans granted
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, PATENT—S.D. Cal.: Restaurant software providers can pursue patent misuse defense against $45 million royalty claim, (Oct 29, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC | Tucker Ellis LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Ameranth, Inc. | Brink Software, Inc.

    By Ravindra Kumar Singh, B.L.

    The software providers plausibly alleged that the patent owner demanded royalties on restaurant technology products and services that did not practice its licensed patents.

    A federal district court in California ruled that two restaurant technology co ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use