Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: High Court grants petition to review case about trademark “tacking” doctrine
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Patent lawyer C. Rachal Winger joins Lee & Hayes
    • PATENT NEWS: Seller of “Tennis Flip Flops” accused of infringing patented sandal design
    • PATENT—D. Mass.: Obviousness-type double patenting did not bar infringement claims
    • PATENT—E.D. Tex.: TQP survives summary judgment in lawsuit against Intuit, Hertz for infringement of TQP encryption patent
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: LG Electronics did not infringe patent for backlighting LCD screens
    • TRADEMARK—D.S.C.: Dispute between Monster Daddy and Monster Cable was not exceptional case
    • TRADEMARK—Fed. Cir.: Genericness rejection of CHILDREN’S DHA affirmed
    • TRADEMARK—S.D.N.Y.: Medical education provider’s marks may cause confusion with healthcare facilities’ mark
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, PATENT NEWS: Seller of “Tennis Flip Flops” accused of infringing patented sandal design, (Jun 23, 2014)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Bishop Diehl & Lee, Ltd.
    Organizations Mentioned:Jukes Shoes, LLC

    By Thomas Long, J.D.

    The owner of a design patent for sandals has filed suit against an online shoe retailer for selling infringing “Tennis Flip Flops.” The complaint was filed in the federal district court in Chicago (Habeeb v. Jukes Shoes, LLC, June 19, 2 ...

    By Thomas Long, J.D.

    The owner of a design patent for sandals has filed suit against an online shoe retailer for selling infringing “Tennis Flip Flops.” The complaint was filed in the federal district court in Chicago (Habeeb v. Jukes Shoes, LLC, June 19, 2014).

    Plaintiff Chad Habeeb asserts ownership of U.S. Patent No. D687,216 (“the ’216 patent”), which claims an ornamental design for a pair of sandals. The claimed design features lines that transgress the uppermost surface of the shoe.

    According to the complaint, via its website at www.jukzshoes.com, defendant Jukes Shoes is selling sandals under the name “Tennis Flip Flops” that feature lines transgressing the surface of the shoe in a manner similar to what is claimed in the ’216 patent. Habeeb alleges that the Tennis Flip Flops are identical in shape, design, and ornamental features to the design claimed by the ’216 Patent, including all of the nonfunctional elements of that design.

    Habeeb requests a permanent injunction barring Jukes Shoes, its officers, agents, members, employees, representatives, assigns, and all others acting in concert or participating with any of them from selling, authorizing, or licensing the sale of flip flops and all other merchandise that infringe upon the ’216 patent. Habeeb also asks for awards of compensatory damages in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty, interest, and attorney’s fees.

    The case is Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-04649.

    Attorneys: Edward L. Bishop (Bishop Diehl & Lee, Ltd.) for Chad Habeeb.

    Companies: Jukes Shoes, LLC

    News: Patent IllinoisNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use