Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—W.D. Ky.: Shifting rationales and VP’s threats support demoted district manager’s age bias claim
    • ARBITRATION—S.D.N.Y.: ACME Markets prevails against intellectually disabled employee it fired after customer complaint
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—E.D. Pa.: Casino worker, fired for sleeping on job, cannot advance discrimination claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Or.: Employees denied religious exemption to COVID-19 vaccine requirement fail on motion to amend
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—3d Cir.: Correctional officer, referred to as ‘bedazzled twat,’ revives hostile environment claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—S.D. Miss.: Police officer, pulled from SWAT team, failed to show sex discrimination
    • EEOC NEWS—2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection is open
    • EEOC NEWS—Employers pay $85K for harassment, discrimination; new suit and subpoena enforcement announced
    • EEOC NEWS—Responding to Texas court decision, EEOC has ‘labeled and shaded the vacated portions of’ guidance
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Federal judge scraps Biden EEOC’s gender identity guidance: here’s what it means for the workplace
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Supreme Court allows Trump Administration to end protected status for Venezuelans – what employers should do now
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—Grievance involving improper leapfrogging of senior employees when assigning position to junior employee sustained
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—S.D. Ohio: Award against employer vacated, arbitrator relied on own sense of industrial justice
    • OSHA NEWS—Date ranges for data collection updated for Site-Specific Targeting inspection program
    • PROCEDURE—N.D. Tex.: Gender-identity portions of EEOC’s 2024 Guidance vacated
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, OSHA NEWS—Date ranges for data collection updated for Site-Specific Targeting inspection program, (May 21, 2025)

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The data collected through Form 300A aids OSHA in determining establishments’ rates of injuries and illnesses.

    The Department of Labor (DOL) Occupational Safety and Health Administration updated the Site-Specific Targeting (SST) inspection prog ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The data collected through Form 300A aids OSHA in determining establishments’ rates of injuries and illnesses.

    The Department of Labor (DOL) Occupational Safety and Health Administration updated the Site-Specific Targeting (SST) inspection program, which directs agency enforcement resources to establishments with the highest rates of injuries and illnesses. An instruction document from OSHA identifies the significant changes made to the program.

    SST inspection program. The SST plan is OSHA’s main state-specific programmed inspection initiative for non-construction workplaces with 20 or more employees. The program uses objective data from injury and illness information submitted by employers under 29 C.F.R. §1904.41. The program helps OSHA achieve the goal of ensuring employers provide safe and healthful workplaces by directing enforcement resources to workplaces with the highest rates of injuries and illnesses. OSHA applies industry and establishment-size criteria to focus data collection on establishments most likely to be experiencing elevated rates and increased numbers of injuries and illnesses, based on submissions of Form 300A data.

    Significant changes. For high-rate establishment, the SST plan selects individual establishments for inspection based on calendar year (CY) 2023 Form 300A data, while the previous SST used CY 2021 data. For upward trending establishments, the SST plan selects individual establishments for inspection based on CY 2021 through 2023 Form 300A data, while the previous SST used CY 2019 through 2021 data. The low-rate establishments list is generated using CY 2023 Form 300A data, while the previous SST used CY 2021 data. Finally, the non-responders list is generated using CY 2023 data, while the previous SST used CY 2021 data.

    State adoption, notification. States with OSHA-approved state plans are required to have their own inspection targeting systems (a “core inspection policy”), which must be revised as necessary to reflect current practices. The inspection policies and procedures must be at least as effective as OSHA’s and be available for review. State plans must notify OSHA within 60 days of the date of notification in the state plan application (SPA) whether they intend to adopt policies and procedures identical to the SST program’s or adopt and maintain different policies and procedures for targeting of general industry inspections. State adoption must be accomplished within six months.

    State plans adopting identically must provide the date of adoption to OSHA, due within 60 days of adoption. State plans adopting or maintaining policies differing from the SST must, within 60 days of adoption, either post its different policies on its state plan website and provide a link to OSHA or provide OSHA with an electronic copy and the name and contact information of an official within the state plan who can assist the public with obtaining a copy.

    News: AgencyNews LaborNews Labor Safety IndustryNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use