Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—W.D. Ky.: Shifting rationales and VP’s threats support demoted district manager’s age bias claim
    • ARBITRATION—S.D.N.Y.: ACME Markets prevails against intellectually disabled employee it fired after customer complaint
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—E.D. Pa.: Casino worker, fired for sleeping on job, cannot advance discrimination claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Or.: Employees denied religious exemption to COVID-19 vaccine requirement fail on motion to amend
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—3d Cir.: Correctional officer, referred to as ‘bedazzled twat,’ revives hostile environment claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—S.D. Miss.: Police officer, pulled from SWAT team, failed to show sex discrimination
    • EEOC NEWS—2024 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection is open
    • EEOC NEWS—Employers pay $85K for harassment, discrimination; new suit and subpoena enforcement announced
    • EEOC NEWS—Responding to Texas court decision, EEOC has ‘labeled and shaded the vacated portions of’ guidance
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Federal judge scraps Biden EEOC’s gender identity guidance: here’s what it means for the workplace
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Supreme Court allows Trump Administration to end protected status for Venezuelans – what employers should do now
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—Grievance involving improper leapfrogging of senior employees when assigning position to junior employee sustained
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—S.D. Ohio: Award against employer vacated, arbitrator relied on own sense of industrial justice
    • OSHA NEWS—Date ranges for data collection updated for Site-Specific Targeting inspection program
    • PROCEDURE—N.D. Tex.: Gender-identity portions of EEOC’s 2024 Guidance vacated
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EEOC NEWS—Responding to Texas court decision, EEOC has ‘labeled and shaded the vacated portions of’ guidance, (May 21, 2025)

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    “[A]ny modification or recission must be approved by a majority vote of the Commission, and as of January 27, 2025, the EEOC lacks a quorum.”

    Responding to a decision by a federal district court in Texas which found that the EEOC’ ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    “[A]ny modification or recission must be approved by a majority vote of the Commission, and as of January 27, 2025, the EEOC lacks a quorum.”

    Responding to a decision by a federal district court in Texas which found that the EEOC’s 2024 Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace contravened Title VII by expanding the definition of “sex” and which vacated the gender-identity related portions of the guidance, the EEOC announced yesterday that it has updated its website to reflect where that decision impacts the guidance.

    Shaded and labeled. Since the EEOC cannot rescind or modify the guidance at this time because it lacks a quorum, the announcement explains, in order to “assist the public following the federal court decision, the EEOC has labeled and shaded the vacated portions of the guidance on the agency’s website.” The modified guidance is available here.

    Lucas was always against it. Acting EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas took the opportunity to remind readers that she voted against the guidance, noting that it had been issued by a 3-2 vote and that she had penned a separate dissent after the guidance was approved.

    The announcement states:

    • “In particular, Lucas has been vocal in her opposition to portions of EEOC’s harassment guidance that took the enforcement position that harassing conduct under Title VII includes ‘denial of access to a bathroom or other sex-segregated facility consistent with [an] individual’s gender identity;’ and that harassing conduct includes ‘repeated and intentional use of a name or pronoun inconsistent with [an] individual’s known gender identity.””

    Elsewhere, regarding the vacated portions, it adds: “Acting Chair Lucas has made clear that she remains opposed to those portions of the guidance.”

    News: AgencyNews Discrimination SexDiscrimination LitigationNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use