Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—1st Cir.: Government entitled to stay pending appeal of injunction preventing DOE’s OCR layoffs
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—D. Idaho: White employee advances associational discrimination, hostile work environment claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—6th Cir.: Employee who requested COVID-19 vax exemption revives claims following Muldrow
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—N.D. Ind.: Employee fired for violating last chance agreement after positive drug test gets bias claim tossed
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—EEOC directs closure of pending disparate impact charges
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—The new H-1B lottery proposal: What employers need to know
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—EEOC increases penalty for violating notice-posting requirements from $680 to $698
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • NLRB NEWS—Employer’s non-solicitation agreement did not hinder employee’s subsequent job search
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—New York law may upset out national labor policy
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—Federal Bureau of Prisons severs ties with union
    • SENATE NEWS—Grassley and Durbin propose bipartisan legislation to reform H-1B and L-1 visa programs
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—S.D.N.Y.: RNs performing utilization reviews for insurance company were exempt professional employees
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, ON THE LABOR FRONT—New York law may upset out national labor policy, (Sep 30, 2025)

    By Michael J. Soltis

    The purported rationale for New York’s power grab of NLRB jurisdiction is that the NLRB is ineffective due to a lack of a quorum.

    In a one-paragraph amendment to its labor laws, the State of New York recently usurped the jurisdiction of the Nat ...

    By Michael J. Soltis

    The purported rationale for New York’s power grab of NLRB jurisdiction is that the NLRB is ineffective due to a lack of a quorum.

    In a one-paragraph amendment to its labor laws, the State of New York recently usurped the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) by giving private sector employees a state law alternative to the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The law is already having an impact. Ten days after the law took effect, on September 15, 2025, the Amazon Workers Union, which represents employees at the employer’s JFK Fulfillment Center, filed an unfair labor practice charge against Amazon with the New York Public Employee Relations Board (PERB) alleging that Amazon terminated an employee because of his union activity.

    The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) recently sued New York seeking to void the New York amendment. The NLRB’s General Counsel alleged that it is preempted by the NLRA under the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution.

    For a discussion of the NLRB’s challenge to the New York amendment, see Mike Soltis’ latest On the Labor Front article: New York Law May Upset Our National Labor Policy.

    MainStory: LaborNews StateLegislation Labor AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use