Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—1st Cir.: Government entitled to stay pending appeal of injunction preventing DOE’s OCR layoffs
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—D. Idaho: White employee advances associational discrimination, hostile work environment claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—6th Cir.: Employee who requested COVID-19 vax exemption revives claims following Muldrow
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEX—N.D. Ind.: Employee fired for violating last chance agreement after positive drug test gets bias claim tossed
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—EEOC directs closure of pending disparate impact charges
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—The new H-1B lottery proposal: What employers need to know
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—EEOC increases penalty for violating notice-posting requirements from $680 to $698
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • NLRB NEWS—Employer’s non-solicitation agreement did not hinder employee’s subsequent job search
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—New York law may upset out national labor policy
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—Federal Bureau of Prisons severs ties with union
    • SENATE NEWS—Grassley and Durbin propose bipartisan legislation to reform H-1B and L-1 visa programs
    • WAGE-HOUR—EXEMPTIONS—S.D.N.Y.: RNs performing utilization reviews for insurance company were exempt professional employees
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, FEDERAL REGULATIONS—EEOC increases penalty for violating notice-posting requirements from $680 to $698, (Sep 30, 2025)

    By WK Editorial Staff

    Adjusting for inflation, the Commission is increasing the maximum penalty per violation specified in 29 CFR 1601.30(a).

    The EEOC has issued a final rule adjusting for inflation the civil monetary penalty for violating the notice-posting requirements i ...

    By WK Editorial Staff

    Adjusting for inflation, the Commission is increasing the maximum penalty per violation specified in 29 CFR 1601.30(a).

    The EEOC has issued a final rule adjusting for inflation the civil monetary penalty for violating the notice-posting requirements in Title VII, the ADA, GINA, and the PWFA from its current $680 to $698. The adjustment was made pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, which further amended the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990.

    Calculation. The adjustment was calculated by comparing the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for October 2023 with the CPI-U for October 2024, resulting in an inflation adjustment factor of 1.02598. The inflation adjustment factor (1.02598) was then multiplied by the most recent civil penalty amount ($680) to calculate the inflation-adjusted penalty level ($697.6664). The inflation-adjusted penalty was then rounded to the nearest dollar ($698). Accordingly, the Commission is now adjusting the maximum penalty per violation specified in 29 CFR 1601.30(a) from $680 to $698.

    The final rule is effective today.

    News: FederalRegulations FedTracker LaborEmployment Discrimination Procedure AgencyNews RemediesDamages

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use