Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • AI Security Threats Prompt Bipartisan Legislative Push in House
    • Citing Federal Inaction, California Governor Issues AI Security Order
    • E.D. Mich.: Health care providers must face electronic privacy, unjust enrichment claims over website tracking
    • Google Faces $462M Fine Over EU Privacy Violations
    • House Bill Would Require CISA to Assess Impact of Cuts in Budget, Workforce
    • New Zealand Reiterates Propriety of Agency Information-Sharing to Protect Children
    • Robotic Platforms From Indian Firm Removed From FCC’s ‘Covered List’
    • State AGs Win Injunction Blocking Federal Access to Commercial Drivers’ Data
    • Theft of PHI in a data breach yields viable common-law claims against nursing facilities by residents
    • U.K. Offers Guidance on Cyber Adversary Simulations
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, New Zealand Reiterates Propriety of Agency Information-Sharing to Protect Children, (Sep 21, 2026)

    By Tony Foley

    Citing public interest in a domestic dispute involving an estranged father’s taking of his three children and their subsequent recovery, the New Zealand Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) emphasized that the country’s Privacy Act ...

    By Tony Foley

    Citing public interest in a domestic dispute involving an estranged father’s taking of his three children and their subsequent recovery, the New Zealand Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) emphasized that the country’s Privacy Act did not prohibit the sharing of information by agencies to protect children from harm.

    Privacy Commissioner Michael Webster said in a statement that the public inquiry highlighted the failure of government officials to share vital information, adding that privacy concerns often were cited as a reason why such sharing didn’t happen. “A child’s wellbeing and safety comes first,” Commissioner Webster said. “The law is clear for child welfare and protection agencies or individuals such as health practitioners or children’s workers; there is no legislative barrier to information sharing where there are wellbeing or safety concerns for a child.“

    Speaking specifically to workers in the child welfare sector, Commissioner Webster assured them that they would not get into trouble for sharing information to protect children, unless the data was shared in bad faith. He added that the OPC had developed detailed guidance on how agencies and individuals working in the sector could share information legally while also maintaining the privacy of children.

    News: InternationalLegislation DataPrivacy

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use