Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—M.D. Pa.: UPMC imaging manager fired after positive drug test advances ADA claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—E.D. Mo.: Jewish employee’s misconduct, not complaints over changes to religious accommodations, spurred firing
    • EVIDENCE, DISCOVERY—S.D. Ind.: Opposing counsel must disclose billing rates after challenging reasonableness of fee petition
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—'It's getting hot in here'—Rhode Island's new workplace accommodations for menopause
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Think before you push ‘record’ Making a secret recording at work is almost always a bad idea
    • LABOR NEWS—NYC Human Rights Commission’s annual report touts ongoing worker protection
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuit filed over USDA’s purported termination of waiver of federal work requirements for certain SNAP recipients
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—White House asks SCOTUS to stop injunction that would keep Register of Copyrights in place
    • NAA CORNER—Guns at Work
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—1st Cir.: Erroneously issued decision did not revive attorney advisor’s untimely challenge to discharge
    • TORT CLAIMS—N.D. Ill.: Machinery company’s qualified privilege defense defeats former employee’s tortious inference claim
    • WAGE-HOUR--EXEMPTIONS—E.D. Mo.: Employee did not lose ‘exempt’ status when employer improperly docked his pay
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—White House asks SCOTUS to stop injunction that would keep Register of Copyrights in place, (Oct 28, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Register of Copyrights

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The Solicitor General argues that the D.C. Circuit’s decision was “another case of improper judicial interference with the President’s power to remove executive officers.”

    On May 9, 2025, the Register of Copyrights, Shira P ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The Solicitor General argues that the D.C. Circuit’s decision was “another case of improper judicial interference with the President’s power to remove executive officers.”

    On May 9, 2025, the Register of Copyrights, Shira Perlmutter, released a prepublication version of a report analyzing the use of copyrighted materials to train generative AI models. When the report was released, the President allegedly disagreed with its recommendations. The next day—a Saturday—the Register was notified by email that she had been terminated from her position “effective immediately.” The President then invoked the Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) to purportedly appoint the Deputy Attorney General as Acting Librarian of Congress. The Deputy Attorney General then appointed a Justice Department official as Acting Register.

    Lawsuit and injunction. Subsequently, Perlmutter sued the President and other officials, arguing her termination was unlawful. She contended that only the Librarian of Congress—not the President—has the authority to fire her. She further argued that the Deputy Attorney General was unlawfully appointed and thus lacked the authority to effectuate her termination. The district court denied her requests for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. It then denied her appeal seeking a stay of its order, after which she filed a motion for an injunction pending appeal with the D.C. Circuit. A panel, with one judge dissenting, granted the motion.

    Application to stay. Now the White House is taking the fight to the Supreme Court with an application to stay the interlocutory injunction, arguing that in issuing it, the D.C. Circuit has provided “another case of improper judicial interference with the President’s power to remove executive officers—here, the Register of Copyrights.” The Solicitor General argues that the appeals court has “had no difficulty” in the past “recognizing that ‘the Library [of Congress] is undoubtedly ‘a component of the Executive Branch.’’”

    “As in past cases where lower courts have impaired the President’s constitutional authority to oversee executive agencies,” the application states, “this Court should grant a stay: the case is certworthy, the President had authority to direct respondent’s removal, the D.C. Circuit lacked equitable authority to reinstate her, and the balance of equities favors the government.”

    The Chief Justice has requested a response to the application, due by 4 p.m. EST on November 10, 2025.

    The docket is No. 25A478.

    News: LitigationNewsTrends WhiteHouseNews AgencyNews PublicEmployees Discharge Retaliation

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use