Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—9th Cir.: Circle K employees who allege company handpicked younger candidate revive age bias claims
    • ARBITRATION—E.D. Mich.: Employees, fired for ethics policy violation, must arbitrate race bias and retaliation claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—E.D. Wash.: Associate Vice President for health company failed to sustain claims that he was terminated due to age
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Cal/OSHA standards board declines to adopt emergency avian flu protections for agriculture workers
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—FP snapshot for manufacturers: appeals courts split on liability standard for workplace harassment by non-employees
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—New lawsuit challenges $100K H-1B price tag proclaimed by White House
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Unions file emergency motion seeking to block shutdown-related mass firings of federal workers
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Unions file new suit alleging use of federal employees’ emails to send partisan messages violates First Amendment
    • PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—N.D. Tex.: American Airlines not subject to monetary liability for breach of loyalty under ERISA
    • PROCEDURE—E.D. Pa.: Employer may challenge if DOL attorney committed fraud against court and opposing party
    • PUBLIC EMPLOYEES—D.P.R.: Trump Administration’s firing of three Puerto Rico Finance Board Members blocked by federal court
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—1st Cir.: Birthright citizenship EO properly enjoined in Massachusetts, New Hampshire cases
    • REPORTS—WHD encounters resource constraints in enforcing child labor laws
    • SENATE NEWS—Warren urges release of September jobs report
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Top labor and employment developments for September 2025
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Unions file new suit alleging use of federal employees’ emails to send partisan messages violates First Amendment, (Oct 6, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:American Federation of Government Employees | Public Citizen Litigation Group | Secretary of Education | U.S. Department of Education

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The suit alleges that the Department of Education replaced employees’ out-of-office email messages with partisan political language regarding the shutdown.

    In a lawsuit filed on Friday in D.C. federal court, the American Federation of Governmen ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    The suit alleges that the Department of Education replaced employees’ out-of-office email messages with partisan political language regarding the shutdown.

    In a lawsuit filed on Friday in D.C. federal court, the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) alleges that the U.S. Department of Education and Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, sued in her official capacity, violated the First Amendment rights of federal agency employees. The union alleges that the Trump Administration is “unlawfully compelling agencies and civil servants across the federal government to engage in political rhetoric to serve the interests of the governing party.” It seeks declaratory and injunctive relief.

    Replaced out-of-office messages. Specifically, the union alleges that, “[w]ithout giving notice to their employees, let alone obtaining their consent, the Department of Education has replaced employees’ out-of-office email messages with partisan language that blames ‘Democrat Senators’ for the shutdown.”

    First Amendment implications. These “efforts to co-opt the voices of rank-and-file employees in the nonpartisan civil service to take part in political messaging” and its actions “[f]orcing civil servants to speak on behalf of the political leadership’s partisan agenda” violates the federal employees’ First Amendment rights, the suit contends.

    The complaint also includes screen shots from multiple government agency websites, to support the argument that there is a “government-wide use of power to tilt the public debate.”

    AFGE is represented by Democracy Forward and Public Citizen Litigation Group in the matter.

    “Government workers have a First Amendment right not to be conscripted as political mouthpieces against their will,” said Cormac Early, Public Citizen Litigation Group attorney.

    The case is No. 1:25-cv-03553.

    News: LitigationNewsTrends PublicEmployees AgencyNews IndividualRights LaborNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use