Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • WAGE-HOUR—OVERTIME—11th Cir.: Domestic service worker revives FLSA claims against Miami couple and their business
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—S.D.N.Y.: Comparator evidence bolsters Black director’s claim firing for retaliation against white contractor was discriminatory
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—D. Colo.: Denver employee failed to adequately request accommodation to COVID vax mandate
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Executive order underpinning SCA contractors' right of first refusal rescinded by Trump administration
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Trump executive order takes on DEI in the workplace: practical considerations for private employers
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Citing privacy concerns, executive branch employees sue over collection of employee information in unsecure server
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuit challenges Trump administration executive order rolling back civil servants’ rights
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Transgender service members file suit over executive order
    • ON THE LABOR FRONT—Of workplace harmony and civility rules under the NLRA
    • OSHA NEWS—$308K in fines for fall, machine fatalities; whistleblower wins back wages
    • REPORTS—Cost increases challenge employers to find new ways to deliver value, mitigate risk while still containing costs
    • TORT CLAIMS—W.D. VA.: Employee survives motion to dismiss defamation claims against employer allegedly based on false statements of sexual harassment
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—Mass. Sup. Ct.: EMT may pursue whistleblower claim following termination for reporting patient injury
    • WORTH NOTING—Federal appeals court cases of note
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Lawsuit challenges Trump administration executive order rolling back civil servants’ rights, (Jan 31, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:American Federation of Government Employees | American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees | Office of Personnel Management

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The lawsuit asks for the regulations to be enjoined to allow the public to make their voices heard through the notice and comment process.

    A lawsuit against the Trump administration filed by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and t ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The lawsuit asks for the regulations to be enjoined to allow the public to make their voices heard through the notice and comment process.

    A lawsuit against the Trump administration filed by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) challenges the administration’s efforts to use allegedly illegal executive orders to politicize the civil service. AFGE and AFSCME allege that President Donald J. Trump illegally exceeded his authority in attempting to unilaterally roll back a regulation protecting the rights of civil servants. The lawsuit also names as a defendant the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for its role in failing to adhere to the Administrative Procedure Act.

    On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an executive order entitled, “Restoring Accountability to Policy-influencing Positions Within the Federal Workforce.” The EO announced the administration’s intent to reclassify many career civil servants into a new category of federal employees, stripping away their civil service protections so that they can be more easily fired. The EO purports to render inoperative certain provisions of regulations that both (1) set limits on the positions that can be exempted from civil service protections; and (2) guarantee that involuntarily reclassified employees are given advance notice and retain their civil service protections. The regulations were lawfully promulgated by the OPM and became effective May 9, 2024.

    Notice and hearing. AFGE and AFSCME argued that they, like all members of the public, are entitled to notice and the opportunity to be heard regarding the government’s changes to the regulations protecting the rights of career civil servants before any changes are made. The EO instructs that the OPM treat these provisions as inoperative immediately, without notice and comment, in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. The lawsuit asks for the regulations to be enjoined to allow the plaintiffs and the public to make their voices heard through the notice and comment process.

    The lawsuit was filed in federal court in the District of Columbia; the case is No. 1:25-cv-00264.

    News: WhiteHouseNews IndustryNewsTrends LaborNews Labor LitigationNewsTrends IndividualRights

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use