Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—8th Cir.: Bank employee, fired after criticizing school masking policy, revives several claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—M.D. Fla.: Employee replaced by younger individual after position was eliminated advances bias claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—M.D. Pa.: Local rotary club’s only employee failed to show club was an employer under Title VII
    • DOL NEWS—EBSA issues FAQs document regarding ACA and IVF
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL Clarifies How Employers Should Calculate FMLA Leave for Overtime + Other Non-Traditional Schedules
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Second Circuit: EEOC Retains Authority After Charging Party Files Suit
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—USCIS revises $100K H-1B fee to exclude certain workers already in the U.S.
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—N.D. Miss.: City utility manager, fired after independent investigation uncovered wrongdoing, cannot advance claims
    • LABOR NEWS—UPS will expedite provision of air-conditioned vehicles to hottest states under agreement with Teamsters
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—D. Alaska: Commercial pilot has statutory right to individually arbitrate grievance before System Board
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—New Jersey AG sues Amazon for misclassification of Flex delivery drivers
    • PROCEDURE—D. Mass.: Termination letter triggered 300-day charge filing deadline, not effective date at end of medical leave
    • PROCEDURE—N.D. Ill.: Tech company employee who worked remotely in Illinois must litigate claims in Texas pursuant to forum selection clause
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, IMMIGRATION NEWS—USCIS revises $100K H-1B fee to exclude certain workers already in the U.S., (Oct 21, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Democracy Forward | Global Nurse Force | U.S. Department of Homeland Security

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The update does not rescind the proclamation or the $100,000 fee for other workers.

    An update to the website of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reflects that, in general, the $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, imposed under ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The update does not rescind the proclamation or the $100,000 fee for other workers.

    An update to the website of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) reflects that, in general, the $100,000 fee on new H-1B visa applications, imposed under a Trump administration proclamation in September, may not apply to individuals already in the U.S. when changing from certain immigration statuses to H-1B. The change follows the filing of a lawsuit by a coalition of plaintiffs arguing that the proclamation and subsequent actions exceed the president’s Constitutional authority and contravened the statutory H-1B process and program.

    Proclamation. On September 19, 2025, President Trump issued a proclamation restricting entry into the U.S. of workers on H-1B visas, conditioning their entry on employers making a $100,000 payment to the federal government. The proclamation states, “Entry into the United States of [H-1B workers] is restricted, except for those aliens whose petitions are accompanied or supplemented by a payment of $100,000.” The proclamation directs DHS to “restrict decisions on petitions not accompanied by a $100,000 payment,” and directs State to “approve only those visa petitions for which the filing employer has made the [$100,000] payment.” Under the proclamation, DHS and State must “deny entry to the United States to any H-1B nonimmigrant” whose employer has not made the $100,000 payment. The proclamation made the new requirements effective as of 12:01 a.m. ET on September 21, 2025.

    The proclamation does not specify to which agency the payment should be made, how it should be paid, where it will be deposited, or how it will be used. While the USCIS, the Department of State, and CBP issued statements collectively stating that the agencies’ policies limit the $100,000 requirement to new petitions and carve out renewals, the new policies do not differentiate between petitions for workers who are outside the U.S. and those for workers already inside the U.S., seemingly expanding the proclamation’s “entry” ban to include individuals who have already entered the country (see Employment Law Daily, October 6, 2025).

    Lawsuit. Global Nurse Force, a health care business helping hospitals across the country fill critical vacancies with qualified nurses from abroad, along with other plaintiffs, including schools, religious organizations, labor unions, and workers, brought a lawsuit against President Donald Trump, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and its subagencies USCIS and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Department of State, as well as the heads of these agencies, challenging the legality and implementation of the proclamation. The plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief, arguing that the proclamation and subsequent actions exceed the president’s Constitutional authority and contravened the statutory H-1B process and program.

    USCIS guidance. Two weeks after the plaintiff coalition filed its lawsuit, USCIS updated its website to reflect that, in general, the $100,000 fee may not apply to individuals already in the U.S. when changing from certain immigration statuses to H-1B. Specifically, the website states: “The Proclamation also does not apply to a petition filed at or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on September 21, 2025, that is requesting an amendment, change of status, or extension of stay for an alien inside the United States where the alien is granted such amendment, change, or extension. Further, an alien beneficiary of such petition will not be considered to be subject to the payment if he or she subsequently departs the United States and applies for a visa based on the approved petition and/or seeks to reenter the United States on a current H-1B visa.” The update does not rescind the proclamation or the $100,000 fee, which continues to apply to highly skilled professionals coming into the U.S. and certain individuals already inside the U.S.

    Statement. “We are encouraged that the government appears to recognize the immediate harm this policy causes to workers already in the United States, including many of our members and employees. But this guidance is limited, unclear and fails to fix the core problem: the Trump-Vance administration is still trying to impose a $100,000 price tag on immigration without authority from Congress,” the coalition said in a statement to Democracy Forward. “Our communities cannot plan around uncertainty, nor can we allow life-saving care, student learning, and scientific research to be held hostage to shifting, arbitrary rules. Our lawsuit will continue until the proclamation is blocked and the rule of law restored.”

    Companies: Global Nurse Force; Democracy Forward

    News: ImmigrationNews AgencyNews Immigration WhiteHouseNews LitigationNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use