Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—8th Cir.: Bank employee, fired after criticizing school masking policy, revives several claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—M.D. Fla.: Employee replaced by younger individual after position was eliminated advances bias claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—M.D. Pa.: Local rotary club’s only employee failed to show club was an employer under Title VII
    • DOL NEWS—EBSA issues FAQs document regarding ACA and IVF
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—DOL Clarifies How Employers Should Calculate FMLA Leave for Overtime + Other Non-Traditional Schedules
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Second Circuit: EEOC Retains Authority After Charging Party Files Suit
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—USCIS revises $100K H-1B fee to exclude certain workers already in the U.S.
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—N.D. Miss.: City utility manager, fired after independent investigation uncovered wrongdoing, cannot advance claims
    • LABOR NEWS—UPS will expedite provision of air-conditioned vehicles to hottest states under agreement with Teamsters
    • LABOR—ARBITRATION—D. Alaska: Commercial pilot has statutory right to individually arbitrate grievance before System Board
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—New Jersey AG sues Amazon for misclassification of Flex delivery drivers
    • PROCEDURE—D. Mass.: Termination letter triggered 300-day charge filing deadline, not effective date at end of medical leave
    • PROCEDURE—N.D. Ill.: Tech company employee who worked remotely in Illinois must litigate claims in Texas pursuant to forum selection clause
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, DOL NEWS—EBSA issues FAQs document regarding ACA and IVF, (Oct 21, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Employee Benefits Security Administration

    By WK Editorial Staff

    The FAQs include information related to Executive Order 14216, “"Expanding Access to In Vitro Fertilization.”

    Last week, the Employee Benefits Security Administration issued a new Frequently Asked Questions document regarding implementat ...

    By WK Editorial Staff

    The FAQs include information related to Executive Order 14216, “"Expanding Access to In Vitro Fertilization.”

    Last week, the Employee Benefits Security Administration issued a new Frequently Asked Questions document regarding implementation of certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act. Released jointly by the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and the Treasury, the FAQs clarify the categories of “excepted benefits” under the ACA and related laws, which are exempt from most ACA market reforms. They outline four categories: (1) non-health insurance products (e.g., auto, liability), always excepted; (2) limited excepted benefits like standalone vision, dental, long-term care, and certain FSAs, EAPs, and HRAs when meeting regulatory criteria; (3) independent non-coordinated benefits such as specified-disease (e.g., cancer) or hospital indemnity policies; and (4) supplemental coverage (e.g., Medigap, Tricare) that complements a primary plan.

    In Vitro Fertilization. The FAQs reference Executive Order-14216, “Expanding Access to In Vitro Fertilization,” issued by the White House in February 2025, which directed federal agencies to identify ways to reduce costs and enhance access to IVF. The Departments of Labor, HHS, and Treasury underscored their commitment to leveraging existing regulations to permit employers to structure fertility benefits—such as IVF—within the framework of excepted benefits. Specifically, they clarify that certain fertility benefits can be offered either as independent, non-coordinated excepted benefits (such as a specified illness policy covering infertility) or as limited excepted benefits in separate contracts without coordination with traditional group health plans.

    Under the independent, non-coordinated category, an employer may offer IVF treatments through a standalone policy, provided it meets certain conditions: a separate contract, no coordination with other plan benefits, and payments made regardless of other coverage. These benefits must be insured (not self-funded) to qualify. Meanwhile, fertility expense reimbursements—including IVF—can be provided through excepted-benefit HRAs if they comply with existing HRA regulations, and fertility coaching or navigation services may be included in employee assistance programs (EAPs) that meet limited excepted benefit criteria by avoiding significant medical care coordination and cost-sharing.

    News: AgencyNews BenefitsNews PensionBenefitPlans

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use