Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DOL NEWS—Wage and Hour Division announces new H-2A farmworker guidance, supplanting 2024 rule
    • AGENCY NEWS—Eleven out of thirty audited hospitals did not comply with PRF terms and conditions
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—M.D. Pa.: Hospital to face lawsuit over firing of nurse who requested pregnancy accommodation
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—D.C. Cir.: Black ‘temp’ attorney can’t revive race-based claims against staffing company or law firm
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—N.D. Ill.: Religious discrimination claim brought by employee terminated for refusing COVID vaccine fails to survive summary judgment
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—AI Call-Monitoring Lawsuits Are Heating Up: 5 Steps Your Business Can Take to Minimize Risk
    • FEDERAL LEGISLATION—White House asserts worker support for tax-free tips proposal
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—OPM final rule creates requirements for retaining federal employees following probationary period
    • LABOR PULSE—Are we witnessing the demise of the National Labor Relations Board?
    • LABOR—NLRB WEEKLY SUMMARY—Weekly summary of NLRB decisions
    • PROCEDURE—N.D. Cal.: Former Super Micro Computer employee can move forward with SOX claim
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—1st Cir.: Refusal to toll FLSA limitations period for opt-in plaintiffs was not error
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, FEDERAL REGULATIONS—OPM final rule creates requirements for retaining federal employees following probationary period, (Jun 23, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Office of Personnel Management

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    OPM expects that efficiencies created by the new regulations outweigh the costs of implementation.

    An Office of Personnel Management (OPM) final rule, scheduled for publication in the Federal Register tomorrow, will rescind regulations on probationary ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    OPM expects that efficiencies created by the new regulations outweigh the costs of implementation.

    An Office of Personnel Management (OPM) final rule, scheduled for publication in the Federal Register tomorrow, will rescind regulations on probationary periods for initial appointments in the competitive service. Under the final rule, to retain a probationer as an employee, an agency must certify that finalizing the appointment advances the public interest. For probationers who will not be retained, the agency must provide written notice of the effective date of the termination action. OPM issued the final rule pursuant to Executive Order (EO) 14284, “Strengthening Probationary Periods in the Federal Service,” which set forth rules and policies for managing probationary periods in the competitive services and trial periods in the excepted services.

    Approval needed for tenure. The EO creates a requirement that agency approval is needed before probationary employees become tenured instead of by default upon the expiration of probationary periods. It purports to “remove[] inappropriate regulatory barriers that inhibit agencies from fully utilizing probationary periods.” The final rule states that, in doing so, the EO fulfills Congress’s intention in the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 that probationary periods be used “as an extension of the examining process to determine an employee’s ability to actually perform the duties of the position.” Congress, according to OPM, believed that it is “inappropriate to restrict an agency’s authority to separate an employee who does not perform acceptably” during the probationary period; thus, the EO removes such restrictions.

    Regulatory changes, expected costs. Specifically, the final rule removes the probationary period regulation in subpart H of part 315 of C.F.R. Title 5 and makes conforming edits to parts 301, 307, 315, 316, 351, and 720, which include references to provisions associated with probationary periods prescribed under subpart H. OPM estimates the rulemaking will require individuals employed by approximately 90 federal agencies to modify their regulations, policies, and procedures to implement the rulemaking and train human resources practitioners and supervisors. OPM also does not expect the new requirements to be meaningfully more burdensome than current processes. Though OPM anticipates costs associated with administering agency approvals of probationary employees, it anticipates that savings to the government based on efficiencies created by new requirements for removing poor performers will outweigh any costs associated with transitioning to the new requirements.

    News: FederalRegulations AgencyNews WhiteHouseNews PublicEmployees

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use