Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—1st Cir.: Oil service tech, fired on day he was cleared to return to work after knee surgery, has ADA claims revived
    • AGENCY NEWS—FTC and DOJ jointly issue antitrust guidelines for business activities affecting workers
    • AGENCY NEWS—Justice Department and OSHA warn against NDAs, can hinder antitrust reporting
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—N.D. Tex.: Texas anesthesiologist loses age discrimination case on summary judgment
    • DISCRIMINATION—RACE—N.D. Miss.: White HR representative, fired for contributing to perceived racial disparities, partially advances claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—1st Cir.: Patient safety professional, fired for COVID vaccine noncompliance, stated religious discrimination claim
    • DOL NEWS—OSHA releases enforcement guidance regarding occupational injury and illness recording and reporting regulation
    • EEOC NEWS—Trucking company to pay $124K to settle allegations of sexual harassment
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Key Employment Law Issues Employers Need to Watch in 2025
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Salary Thresholds and Minimum Wage for 2025
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—EBSA proposes revisions, exceptions regarding fiduciary transactions
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—FAR proposed rule includes workforce requirements for IT & cybersecurity contracts
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—PBGC proposes corrections, clarifications, and improvements to certain regulations
    • LABOR PULSE—A look (way) back and (a little bit) forward, as Big Labor braces for Trump II
    • RETALIATION–D. Mass.: Police officer who resigned with charges pending fails to advance claim
    • STATE-LAW CLAIMS—9th Cir.: Civil detainees entitled to minimum wage under Washington law
    • TORT CLAIMS—D. Kan.: Wealth management industry employees' class action lawsuit survives dismissal motion by parent entity
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—President Biden issues statement to ‘affirm’ that the Equal Rights Amendment ‘is the law of the land’
    • WORTH NOTING—Cases of note dealing with religious discrimination
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, FEDERAL REGULATIONS—EBSA proposes revisions, exceptions regarding fiduciary transactions, (Jan 17, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Employee Benefits Security Administration

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    Comments for both publications are due by 75 days after publication in the Federal Register.

    The Department of Labor (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) published a proposed rule that would clarify the term “adequate consider ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    Comments for both publications are due by 75 days after publication in the Federal Register.

    The Department of Labor (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) published a proposed rule that would clarify the term “adequate consideration” as set forth under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and govern the fiduciary determination of fair market value in connection with certain employee stock ownership plan transactions. The DOL also published notice of a proposed class exemption for fiduciaries from certain prohibited transaction restrictions of ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).

    Adequate consideration under ERISA. The EBSA is publishing a proposed rule that would clarify the term “adequate consideration” as set forth under §3(18)(B) of ERISA and govern the fiduciary determination of fair market value in connection with certain employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) transactions involving employer stock. The EBSA also is withdrawing a 1988 proposed rule on a similar subject. The new proposal would provide formal guidance for acceptable standards and procedures to establish good faith fair market value for shares of a business to be acquired by an ESOP. The proposed rule would also govern the determination of fair market value in accordance with the definition of the term adequate consideration under §3(18)(B), as applied to certain ESOP transactions involving employer stock. Comments on the proposed rule are due by 75 days after publication in the Federal Register.

    Proposed safe harbor. The EBSA is also publishing notice of a proposed class exemption from certain prohibited transaction restrictions of ERISA and the IRC. The provisions at issue prohibit fiduciaries, with respect to an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP), from causing the ESOP to purchase an asset from certain related parties, including officers, directors, and 10 percent or more shareholders of the employing company. The exemption would provide relief from these provisions to specific parties involved in an ESOP’s initial acquisition of non-publicly traded employer common stock from a selling shareholder: selling shareholders, any trustee that is independent of the employer and represents the interests of the ESOP in the transaction, any appraiser that is independent of the employer and represents the interests of the ESOP in the transaction, and any fiduciary of the ESOP with authority to hire, monitor, or fire the independent trustee. The proposed exemptive relief is subject to protective conditions designed to ensure any transaction relying on the exemption is prudent and based on a reliable appraisal of the stock’s fair market value. The DOL proposed that the exemption would be in effect for transactions that occur 60 days after the date it publishes notice of final exemption in the Federal Register. Written comments and requests for a public hearing on the proposal must be submitted within 75 days of the proposal’s publication in the Federal Register.

    News: FederalRegulations AgencyNews BenefitsNews PensionBenefitPlans

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use