Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • RETALIATION—6th Cir.: U.S. Bank execs, fired after complaining about supervisor, revive retaliation claim
    • DISCRIMINATION—AGE—W.D. Pa.: Firing over falsified record raises age bias question
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—7th Cir.: Chicago prevails in ADA, wrongful death suit tied to narcotics officer’s COVID-19 exposure
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—D. Mass.: EEOC’s claims advance where job offer was terminated after breast cancer diagnosis
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—N.D. Ala.: Employee’s evidence of HWE insufficient, despite similar allegations from three other women
    • ECONOMIC NEWS—Commerce Department gets query from Senator Warren about changes in key inflation metrics
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Employers are grappling with their cannabis policies
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—The ‘no tax’ overtime myth: Employer payroll and reporting obligations under the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ Act explained
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—FMCSA proposes making English language proficiency violations immediate out-of-service offense for truck drivers
    • INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS—7th Cir.: Town supervisors entitled to qualified immunity against administrator’s First Amendment retaliation claim
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—D.R.I.: VA not entitled to terminate master collective bargaining agreement while injunction remained in force
    • REPORTS—Global employee engagement falls to lowest level since 2020, Gallup finds
    • TORT CLAIMS—N.D. Cal.: Electronics manufacturer’s fraud and trade-secret claims over patent portfolio transfer survive dismissal
    • WAGE-HOUR—D. Md.: Nuclear power employees sent back to drawing board on wage-fixing claims
    • WHISTLEBLOWERS—3d Cir.: ‘Other efforts’ prong of FCA’s anti-retaliation provision required objectively reasonable belief that the employer violated FCA
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—The ‘no tax’ overtime myth: Employer payroll and reporting obligations under the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ Act explained, (Aug 10, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Fennemore

    By June Monroe and Elise O'Brien of Fennemore

    The "One Big Beautiful Bill" has generated attention (and confusion) among employers. Much of the conversation has focused on "no tax on overtime" or "no tax on tips." But for employers, that shorthand is misleading.

    The law does not eliminate payroll ...

    By June Monroe and Elise O'Brien of Fennemore

    The "One Big Beautiful Bill" has generated attention (and confusion) among employers. Much of the conversation has focused on "no tax on overtime" or "no tax on tips." But for employers, that shorthand is misleading.

    The law does not eliminate payroll taxes or change how overtime must be calculated or paid. Instead, it creates a temporary individual income tax deduction for employees. That distinction matters, particularly for California employers already navigating complex wage-and-hour rules.

    As questions continue beyond tax season, now is a good time for employers to reset expectations and ensure payroll and reporting practices align with what the law actually requires.

    No change to overtime pay obligations

    Employers must continue paying overtime exactly as required under federal and state law.

    Under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), nonexempt employees must receive overtime at one-and-one-half times their regular rate for hours worked over 40 in a workweek.

    California law is more generous.

    Nonexempt employees are entitled to overtime at one-and-one-half times their regular rate for:

    • Hours worked over 8 in a workday (up to 12)

    • Hours worked over 40 in a workweek

    • The first 8 hours on the seventh consecutive day

    Double time (two times the regular rate) applies for:

    • Hours worked over 12 in a workday

    • Hours worked over 8 on the seventh consecutive day

    None of these obligations change under the new law.

    The federal deduction applies only to the FLSA-required overtime premium—the additional 0.5 above the regular rate for hours over 40 in a workweek. Overtime or double time paid solely under California law does not independently qualify.

    The deduction is also capped and subject to income-based phaseouts, reinforcing that it is a limited tax benefit and not a change to wage calculations.

    No change to payroll tax withholding

    Despite the headlines, employers must continue to withhold and remit federal and state income tax, Social Security tax, Medicare tax, and other state payroll taxes on overtime and tips as usual.

    For employers, payroll practices remain unchanged. There is no payroll-level exemption. Any benefit is realized by employees when they file their individual tax returns.

    Where confusion and risk can arise

    The gap between the law's headline and its actual operation is already creating confusion.

    Employees may expect higher take-home pay or assume overtime is tax-free. In California's highly regulated wage environment, those misunderstandings can lead to disputes if employees believe their pay is being calculated incorrectly.

    There is also a risk in how employers communicate. Statements suggesting overtime is ‘tax-free’ or attempting to quantify employee tax savings can lead to misunderstandings and potential disputes over pay.

    New reporting requirements on the horizon

    Beginning with this tax year 2026 (forms issued in early 2027), employers are expected to separately report: qualified overtime premium amounts and tip income on updated Forms W-2 and other applicable returns.

    To prepare, employers should work with payroll providers now to ensure systems can:

    • Distinguish the federal FLSA overtime premium from base wages

    • Separate federal overtime premiums from state-law overtime and double-time amounts

    • Track tip income consistent with existing federal reporting rules

    Advance preparation will help reduce compliance risk as IRS guidance and form requirements are finalized.

    Practical steps for California employers

    For now, employers should focus on preparation, consistency, and clarity:

    • Confirm payroll systems can distinguish the FLSA overtime premium from state-law required overtime and double-time amounts.

    • Communicate internally that withholding rules remain unchanged.

    • Monitor IRS guidance and form revisions.

    • Avoid making employee-facing statements suggesting overtime or tips are "tax-free." Employers should exercise caution in providing specific "deduction" amounts to employees and/or providing tax advice, and if needed, should direct employees to consult with their personal tax advisors.

    • Multi-state employers should carefully review state overtime rules to avoid errors when calculating and reporting qualified overtime premium amounts at year-end.

    The "no tax on overtime" label is catchy, but incomplete.

    For California employers, the fundamentals remain the same: comply with existing wage-and-hour laws, maintain accurate payroll practices, and prepare for evolving reporting requirements.

    June Monroe and Elise O'Brien

    Fennemore

    2394 E Camelback Rd

    Suite 600

    Phoenix

    AZ 85016

    United States

    Tel.: +1 602 916 5000

    E-mail: jabelson@fennemorelaw.com

    URL: www.fennemorelaw.com/

    (c) Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: (Fennemore).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights FederalLegislation Overtime WageHour IndustryNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use