Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—4th Cir.: Wells Fargo entitled to JMOL on fired director’s disability claims but not retaliation claim
    • AGENCY NEWS—Foreign Service Grievance Board cannot exercise unreviewable final authority, OLC determines
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—E.D. Pa.: Professor with MS advances ADA accommodation claim against Valley Forge Military Academy
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—M.D. La.: Rejected job applicant’s ADA disability discrimination suit against Al Copeland Investments dismissed
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—9th Cir.: Washington state workers revive failure-to-accommodate claims in COVID-19 vaccine case
    • DOL NEWS—Following fatalities, OSHA finds Wisconsin food manufacturer repeatedly exposed workers to safety hazards
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Is GIPA the New BIPA? 5 Steps for Healthcare Employers in Illinois as Genetic Information Discrimination Claims Rise
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Neural Data Is the Next Frontier in Biometric Privacy &- And Illinois Employers Should Be Paying Attention
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DHS proposes $103,265 H-1B fee, raises specter of total fee amount exceeding $203K
    • LABOR NEWS—Major unions divided ahead of escalating trade war with Canada
    • LABOR PULSE—Organized labor in the shadowland of cannabis regulation: a case study
    • LABOR—UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES—D.C. Cir.: NLRB properly rejected employer’s defenses that picketing was unlawful secondary or recognitional picketing
    • RETALIATION—D. Minn.: Railroad employee advances FRSA claim for interference with medical treatment
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—Neural Data Is the Next Frontier in Biometric Privacy &- And Illinois Employers Should Be Paying Attention, (Aug 24, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Barnes & Thornburg
    Organizations Mentioned:Barnes & Thornburg, LLP

    By Anthony Molina and John F. Kuenstler of Barnes & Thornburg LLP

    Workplace technology that can read your brain activity is no longer hypothetical, and Illinois legislators want to make sure the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) keeps up.

    What is Neural Data?

    Neural data is information produced by measuring ac ...

    By Anthony Molina and John F. Kuenstler of Barnes & Thornburg LLP

    Workplace technology that can read your brain activity is no longer hypothetical, and Illinois legislators want to make sure the Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) keeps up.

    What is Neural Data?

    Neural data is information produced by measuring activity in a person’s central or peripheral nervous system. Think of it as data drawn from the brain, spinal cord, or nerve pathways. Unlike fingerprints or facial scans, neural data can shed light on cognitive states, focus, fatigue, and emotional responses.

    This is becoming relevant for employers because wearable neurotechnology such as headbands that detect drowsiness or earbuds that track concentration - is increasingly being developed for workplace use. Employers who adopt these tools may be collecting neural data without fully realizing it.

    Growing Wave of Legislation

    California and Colorado were the first states to classify neural data as sensitive personal information in 2024. Connecticut, Montana, and others have since followed, and several more states have introduced their own bills. While most of these measures target consumer privacy, legislatures are beginning to focus on the workplace as well.

    Illinois: HB 2984

    In Illinois, HB 2984 would amend the Biometric Information Privacy Act (740 ILCS 14/10) to bring neural data within BIPA’s reach. The bill would:

    • Redefine “biometric identifier” to expressly include neural data; and

    • Define “neural data” as information generated by measuring activity of an individual’s central or peripheral nervous system that is not inferred from non-neural information.

    Because BIPA already requires written notice, informed consent, and strict data handling for biometric identifiers - and carries a private right of action - this expansion would have real consequences for any employer using technology that captures neural activity.

    What to Do Now

    HB 2984 has not yet been enacted, but the trajectory is clear. Employers should review any workplace tools that monitor cognitive or physiological states and assess whether their BIPA compliance policies would need updating.

    We will continue to provide updates as this area of the law evolves. In the meantime, we encourage employers to treat neural data privacy as an emerging priority rather than a future concern.

    Anthony Molina

    John F. Kuenstler

    Barnes & Thornburg LLP

    One N. Wacker Drive

    Suite 4400

    Chicago, IL 60606-2833

    United States

    Tel.: +1 317 236 1313

    E-mail: Justin.Scott@btlaw.com

    URL: www.btlaw.com/

    © Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: Anthony Molina and John F. Kuenstler (Barnes & Thornburg).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights Privacy IllinoisNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use