Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—11th Cir.: Failure to affirmatively raise employee-headcount cap defense results in maximum Title VII damages
    • ECONOMIC NEWS—Fed’s Cook ‘optimistic’ about AI, but notes risks to economy, jobs
    • EEOC NEWS—$525K netted to resolve race, religious discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation allegations; new disability bias suit filed
    • EEOC NEWS—Commission to consider replacing strategic enforcement plan as part of June 4 open meeting
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—EEOC Proposes to End EEO-1 Reporting
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—ICE’s Updated I-9 Audit Guidelines: What Employers Need to Know
    • FEDERAL REGULATIONS—DOL final rule reshapes union reporting with new, complex top-tier disclosure regime
    • LABOR—ORGANIZING, ELECTIONS—NLRB: Employer unlawfully announced abrupt shutdown rather than recognize union
    • RETALIATION—7th Cir.: School district talent officer entitled to qualified immunity in university administrator’s First Amendment retaliation claim
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES—Safe, effective adoption of AI by law firms discussed at ABA summit
    • TORT CLAIMS—N.D. Ohio: Trucker’s claims against freight platforms fail for lack of specificity
    • USERRA, VETERANS—N.D. Ill.: Agronomy employee, fired day before third military leave, advances USERRA claims
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Administration to take steps toward U.S.-China Board of Trade
    • WORTH NOTING—Cases of note dealing with wage and hour issues
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EXPERT INSIGHTS—EEOC Proposes to End EEO-1 Reporting, (May 29, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Bond, Schoeneck & King
    Organizations Mentioned:Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC | U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

    By Christa Richer Cook of Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC

    For several decades, private employers with 100 or more employees and certain federal contractors have been required to annually file the EEO-1 report. The EEO-1 report collected information about the race/ethnicity and sex of large employers' workfo ...

    By Christa Richer Cook of Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC

    For several decades, private employers with 100 or more employees and certain federal contractors have been required to annually file the EEO-1 report. The EEO-1 report collected information about the race/ethnicity and sex of large employers' workforces at each location by job category. Similar reporting requirements exist for labor unions (the EEO-3), state and local governments (the EEO-4) and public and secondary school systems (the EEO-5). On May 14, 2026, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) submitted a proposed rule to a division within the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that would end the EEO-1 and other reporting mandates. This development comes at a time when employers have been waiting for the annual EEO-1 reporting portal to open for the 2026 filing cycle.

    The proposed rule, which is titled “Rescission of EEO-1, EEO-2, EEO-3, EEO-4, EEO-5, and Reporting Requirement Under Title VII, the ADA, GINA, and the PWFA,” seems to align with the Trump administration’s policies and enforcement priorities targeting DEI. Employers often use EEO-1 reporting as a way to assist them in analyzing their own DEI progress or to identify areas of potential discrimination. The Trump administration has taken the position that employers should not be tracking race-based or sex-based data and that these and other DEI initiatives often cross the line into unlawful discrimination against white applicants and employees. This development is also being seen as consistent with the EEOC's recent commitment to prioritizing civil rights cases focused on “anti-white” bias and investigating companies for their diversity programs.

    The EEOC has not announced how this significant departure will impact employers’ obligations this year and it is unclear if or when the proposal will be finalized. While the proposal to eliminate the EEO-1 report introduces uncertainty, for now, the safest course of action is for employers to assume that EEO-1 reporting remains in effect. It is likely employers may still have to file EEO-1 reports sometime in 2026 (which will reflect demographic data from a workforce snapshot during the final quarter of 2025), because of the time-consuming process required to implement the EEOC’s proposed rule. The proposal must first be reviewed by OMB and then published in the Federal Register for public comment before any final rule can be adopted.

    The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Christa Richer Cook

    Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC

    600 Third Avenue

    22nd Floor

    New York, NY 10016-1915 United States

    Tel: +1 646 253 2300

    URL: www.bsk.com/

    © Mondaq Ltd, 2026 - Tel. +44 (0)20 8544 8300 - http://www.mondaq.com

    Attorneys: Christa Richer Cook (Bond, Schoeneck & King).

    ExpertInsights: ExpertInsights Discrimination RaceDiscrimination SexDiscrimination DisabilityDiscrimination PregnancyDiscrimination AgencyNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use