Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—4th Cir.: Injunction banning enforcement of provisions in DEI-related EOs stayed pending appeal
    • CLASS ACTIONS—E.D. Cal.: Class certified against NCAA for potential Sherman Act violations due to volunteer coaches
    • CONTRACT CLAIMS—2d Cir.: No-poach agreement between Saks and luxury brands did not violate Sherman Act
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—W.D. Pa.: Locomotive shop electrician with seizure disorder gets trial on disability discrimination claims
    • DISCRIMINATION—PREGNANCY—E.D. Pa.: Five Below employee fired two weeks before maternity leave defeats summary judgment
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—M.D. Fla.: PGA Tour prevails against COVID-19 vaccine exemption claim
    • EEOC NEWS—Two employers pay more than $1.6M to resolve allegations of age, sex discrimination
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Artificial Intelligence for the safety professional–benefits, risks, and legal implications
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—FTC labor task force reinforces importance of avoiding anticompetitive labor practices
    • LABOR NEWS—OPM memo ‘provides collective bargaining guidance to agencies engaged in RIFs’
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—White House seeks SCOTUS relief in one case, meanwhile faces questions as to whether it ignored a federal judge’s order in another
    • PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—9th Cir.: Employer group health insurance policyholder had no standing to challenge Parity Act
    • RETALIATION—E.D. Pa.: Lack of informed consent rejected as the basis of employees’ FCA retaliation claim
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—9th Cir.: Reasonable assumptions in calculating amount in controversy sufficient for federal court removal
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—Additional executive orders revoked by Trump
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—More federal workers losing their jobs under Trump Administration
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EEOC NEWS—Two employers pay more than $1.6M to resolve allegations of age, sex discrimination, (Mar 17, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Security Engineers, Inc. | Taco Bell | Teamlyders, LLC | Washington Unified School District

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    Additionally, the EEOC filed a new lawsuit alleging sexual harassment of teenage employees.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) entered into two settlements totaling $1,617,000 to resolve allegations that employers engaged in discrimina ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    Additionally, the EEOC filed a new lawsuit alleging sexual harassment of teenage employees.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) entered into two settlements totaling $1,617,000 to resolve allegations that employers engaged in discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1965 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The EEOC also filed a new lawsuit against Taco Bell franchisees alleging that a senior area manager sexually harassed female employees, including multiple teenage employees.

    Sex discrimination. The EEOC entered into $1.6 million settlement with Security Engineers, Inc., an Alabama contract security solutions provider, to settle a Title VII sex discrimination lawsuit filed by the agency. The lawsuit alleged the employer engaged in sex discrimination throughout Alabama by denying security officer jobs and assignments to a class of women despite their experience in security, law enforcement, or the military. Discriminatory directives in the employer’s human resources database said, “DO NOT schedule a female for this post” and “Post is MALE ONLY!” The employer further admitted to some female applicants that they would not be selected for security positions or assignments because of sex. The EEOC alleged the pattern or practice of sex discrimination continued for several years, beginning in at least 2017. Under the settlement, the employer will provide monetary relief to a class of women denied security officer positions. The settlement also prohibits the employer from discriminating based on sex and requires that it delete all directives not to select, assign, or hire women because of sex, and requires the employer to conduct training, monitoring, and reporting.

    The EEOC filed its lawsuit in the Northern District of Alabama; the case is No. 2:23-cv-01213-AMM.

    Age discrimination. The EEOC entered into a $17,000 settlement with the Washington Unified School District in Fresno, California, to resolve an age discrimination charge under the ADEA. The EEOC alleged that the employer denied an employee reasonable accommodation, subjected the employee to different terms and conditions of employment, and discharged the employee because of age and disability. Under the settlement, the employer will provide the employee with monetary relief and a neutral letter of reference and will train supervisors and managers on the ADEA and complaint handling. The employer will also post a notice to all employees about the resolution of the charge and their rights under federal anti-discrimination law.

    Sexual harassment, retaliation. A new lawsuit by the EEOC alleges six entities operating Taco Bell restaurants in Michigan violated Title VII when they allowed a senior area manager to sexually harass female employees, including multiple teenage employees. The lawsuit alleges the harassment occurred on a near-daily basis at multiple Taco Bell restaurants he supervised; the harassment included inappropriate sexual comments, unwanted and inappropriate touching, and requests for videos or images of an employee having sex with her boyfriend. The EEOC alleged the employers failed to take effective action against the manager, despite receiving multiple complaints. The EEOC further alleged a local area manager was fired on the same day she complained of the senior area manager’s sexual harassment. After that complaint, the senior area manager continued to sexually harass female employees for several months before he was fired.

    The EEOC filed its lawsuit in the Eastern District of Michigan; the case is No. 25-10575.

    Companies: Security Engineers, Inc.; Washington Unified School District; Teamlyders, LLC

    News: AgencyNews LitigationNewsTrends Discrimination SexDiscrimination SexualHarassment AgeDiscrimination RemediesDamages

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use