Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • DISCRIMINATION—Wis. Sup. Ct.: School district engaged in arrest-record discrimination in firing of employees cited for municipal theft
    • DISCRIMINATION—6th Cir.: New trial denied in sexual and racial harassment suit
    • DISCRIMINATION—RELIGIOUS—3d Cir.: Physician, denied COVID vaccine exemption, cannot revive claims against Main Line Health
    • EEOC NEWS—Agency files age discrimination lawsuit, subpoena enforcement action under Pregnant Workers Fairness Act
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New uncertainty for children with disabilities with move to close Education Department
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Second Circuit ruling: employers must accommodate workers even if they can perform essential job functions without accommodation
    • GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS—Or. Sup. Ct.: Community workforce agreement a ‘rule’ for purposes of Oregon’s Administrative Procedures Act
    • LABOR PULSE—Six years in, what have I learned from ‘Labor Pulse’?
    • OSHA NEWS—$156K settlement after fatal fall; other fall, chemical penalties proposed
    • WAGE-HOUR—CLASS ACTIONS—S.D.N.Y.: Nail technician denied conditional certification of collective action alleging time shaving and improper pay deductions
    • WHITE HOUSE NEWS—Presidential memo directs repeal of ‘unlawful regulations’ without notice and comment
    • WORTH NOTING—Federal appeals court cases of note
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, EEOC NEWS—Agency files age discrimination lawsuit, subpoena enforcement action under Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, (Apr 11, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Allen Theatres, Inc. | R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The EEOC’s subpoena enforcement action is its first under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission entered into a $250,000 settlement with a movie theater chain accused of violating the Age Discrimination i ...

    By Patricia K. Ruiz, J.D.

    The EEOC’s subpoena enforcement action is its first under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission entered into a $250,000 settlement with a movie theater chain accused of violating the Age Discrimination in Employment Act when it fired an employee based on his age and withheld health insurance coverage for employees aged 65 or older who were eligible for Medicare. The EEOC also filed suit against a freight transportation and logistics company to enforce a subpoena issued in its investigation of alleged violations of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) and Title VII.

    Age discrimination. The EEOC entered into a $250,000 settlement to resolve an ADEA lawsuit with Allen Theatres, Inc., which operates a chain of movie theaters in New Mexico, Arizona, and Colorado. The lawsuit alleged that the employer’s president forced a theater manager to retire in September 2020 because he was 73 years old. The company refused to allow him to work in March 2021 when the theaters reopened after COVID-19 pandemic began. The EEOC further alleged the employer maintained a companywide discriminatory compensation policy that stopped paying for the manager’s family health insurance coverage because he was over 65 years old and eligible for Medicare. In addition to paying the settlement amount to the manager and other aggrieved individuals, the two-year consent decree settling the suit requires the employer to offer health insurance coverage under the company’s health benefit plan to any current employee who is 65 years old or over and not currently enrolled in the company’s plan. The consent decree also requires the employer to revise its policies to include prohibition of age discrimination, including robust investigative and training procedures relating to age discrimination.

    The EEOC filed its lawsuit in the District of New Mexico; the case is No. 1:24-cv-00965-KWR-KK.

    Sex, pregnancy discrimination. The EEOC filed a lawsuit against R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC, an Illinois freight transportation and logistics company, to enforce a subpoena that the EEOC issued during their investigation of a charge alleging sex and pregnancy discrimination in violation of Title VII and the PWFA, which took effect in June 2023. A driver working for R&L Carriers alleged that the employers discriminated against her based on sex, failed to reasonably accommodate her pregnancy-related restrictions, and placed her on involuntary unpaid leave. The subpoena seeks, among other items, a list of employees who worked at the same location from 2023 to present and a list of any drivers in Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, South Dakota, and North Dakota who requested accommodations for pregnancy-related restrictions from June 27, 2023, to the present.

    The EEOC filed its lawsuit in the Northern District of Illinois; the case is No. 25-cv-528.

    Companies: Allen Theatres, Inc.; R&L Carriers Shared Services, LLC

    News: AgencyNews PregnancyDiscrimination PensionBenefitPlans Discrimination SexDiscrimination AgeDiscrimination Discharge RemediesDamages

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use