Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
    • California—Corporate Income Tax: Company’s Divisions Did Not Operate as a Unitary Business
    • California—Corporate Income Tax: Holding Company and Equipment Rental Business Subsidiary Were Not Unitary
    • California—Corporate Income Tax: Pesticide Manufacturer Could Not Use Apportionment Formula for Agricultural Businesses
    • California—Corporate Income Tax: Sidewalk Safety Mat Manufacturer Not Entitled to Research Credit
    • Georgia—Sales and Use Tax: Jet Fuel Tax Rates for Q4 of 2026 Released
    • Georgia—Sales and Use Tax: Local Rate Chart Released for Q4 of 2026
    • Georgia—Sales and Use Tax: New Tax Rate Chart Released for Sales Exempt from Certain Local Taxes
    • Georgia—Sales and Use Tax: Prepaid Local Tax Rate Chart for Motor Fuels for Highway Use Updated
    • Georgia—Sales and Use Tax: Tax Rate Chart for Energy Sold to Manufacturers Issued for Q4 of 2026
    • Georgia—Sales and Use Tax: Updated Chart of Sales Exempt from TSPLOST Issued
    • Illinois—Sales and Use, Utilities Taxes: Regulations Adopted for Quantum Computing Exemptions, Other Tax Changes
    • Indiana—Corporate Income Tax: Updated Guidance Issued on Health Reimbursement Arrangement Tax Credit
    • Massachusetts—Multiple Taxes: Interest Rates Remain Unchanged for the Fourth Quarter of 2026
    • South Carolina—Tobacco Tax: New Taxes on Nicotine Vapor Products and Heat Not Burn Products Discussed
  • Articles
  • Articles

    State Tax Day - Current, S.3, California—Corporate Income Tax: Holding Company and Equipment Rental Business Subsidiary Were Not Unitary, (Sep 11, 2026)

    An Arizona holding company and its equipment rental business subsidiary, which operated throughout the United States including California, were not engaged in a unitary business when the holding company sold part of its interest in the equipment rent ...

    An Arizona holding company and its equipment rental business subsidiary, which operated throughout the United States including California, were not engaged in a unitary business when the holding company sold part of its interest in the equipment rental business. Thus, gain from the sale of that interest was nonbusiness income allocable outside of California for tax purposes. The Franchise Tax Board argued that the holding company and the equipment rental business were engaged in a unitary business, so gain from the sale of the membership interest was apportionable business income. However, the contribution or dependency test for determining the existence of a unitary business was not met, as there was no substantial flow of value or integrated executive force. Also, the three unities test was not met, because unity of operation was not established.

    Watts, California Office of Tax Appeals, 2026-OTA-423, February 28, 2025, petition for rehearing denied, 2026-OTA-424, July 14, 2026, ¶408-121

    Other References:

    Explanations at ¶11-520

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use