Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—9th Cir.: Government’s mandamus petition denied, preliminary injunction of RIFs vacated and remanded
    • BENEFITS NEWS—Lyft pays NJ labor department over $19M as result of driver misclassification, non-contribution to funds
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—D. Nev.: NCAA five-year rule strictly commercial and subject to Sherman Act
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—D. Conn.: Walmart employee’s disability discrimination claim may move forward
    • DISCRIMINATION—M.D. Tenn.: Goodwill to face trial on gay driver’s claims of coworker sex/race harassment, retaliatory response
    • DISCRIMINATION—SEXUAL HARASSMENT—D.D.C.: EFAA scope determined on arbitration question of first impression in D.C. Circuit
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Fast-Tracking Union Representation? California, Uber, Lyft and SEIU Unite Behind Driver-Union Bill
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—NLRB Acting GC Memorandum Aims at Early Identification and Investigation of Section 10(j) Cases
    • IMMIGRATION NEWS—Trump administration places unprecedented price tag on H-1B visas
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Class action suit seeks to restore grants to Senior Community Service Employment Program
    • LITIGATION NEWS, TRENDS—Trump files emergency application with Supreme Court to overturn Cook removal injunction
    • REPORTS—Public sees benefits from strong standards for government workers
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, BENEFITS NEWS—Lyft pays NJ labor department over $19M as result of driver misclassification, non-contribution to funds, (Sep 22, 2025)

    Organizations Mentioned:Lyft, Inc.

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Claims by drivers for benefits led the New Jersey Department of Labor to conduct an audit, which uncovered the employer’s failure to make required contributions.

    Last week, New Jersey’s Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin announced that ...

    By Brandi O. Brown, J.D.

    Claims by drivers for benefits led the New Jersey Department of Labor to conduct an audit, which uncovered the employer’s failure to make required contributions.

    Last week, New Jersey’s Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin announced that ride-share company Lyft had submitted $19,435,087.06 in payments to the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development’s (NJDOL’s) unemployment, temporary disability, family leave insurance trust funds, and workforce development funds after an audit determined that Lyft improperly classified over 100,000 drivers as independent contractors and, as a result, failed to make required contributions to the state funds from 2014 to 2017.

    “We will not allow businesses to exploit workers by misclassifying them, stripping employees of essential benefits and avoiding their responsibility to support programs that protect our workforce,” said New Jersey Attorney General Matthew J. Platkin.

    Audit. Claims made by Lyft drivers triggered an audit that revealed the employer’s failure to make contributions. Lyft was assessed more than $10.8 million in past due contributions, plus penalties and interest of $8.5 million. Initially, although it paid the $10.8 million to stop the running of interest, Lyft contested NJDOL’s findings, and the case was transmitted to New Jersey’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL) for a hearing. However, it later withdrew its request and paid the remaining balance owed.

    “Misclassification imposes a financial toll on both good actor employers and misclassified workers, who lose critical rights such as minimum wage, overtime pay, workers’ compensation coverage, unemployment insurance, earned sick leave, family leave, and more,” said New Jersey Labor Commissioner Robert Asaro-Angelo. “Although many allege that being an employee stifles flexibility, this couldn’t be further from the truth. There is no reason temporary or on-demand workers who work flexible hours, or even minutes at a time, can’t be treated like other employees.”

    News: LitigationNewsTrends WageHour BenefitsNews RemediesDamages PensionBenefitPlans

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use