Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—5th Cir.: GM’s “Bump the Competition” program did not cause predatory pricing
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: FTC requires largest supermarket divestiture as condition of Albertsons-Safeway merger
    • ADVERTISING—9th Cir.: eBay cleared of consumer’s false advertising, unfair competition claims
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Japan-based Sanden to plead guilty for role in auto parts cartel
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Retail concrete supplier charges cement dealer with price discrimination
    • ANTITRUST—E.D.N.Y.: Airfreight shipping purchasers, airlines to commence summary judgment process
    • ANTITRUST—N.D. Cal.: Interlocutory appeal denied in lithium ion battery litigation
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Auto dealer association seeks declaratory judgment in Tesla dealer license dispute
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Former FTC regional director Anthony DiResta joins Holland & Knight
    • PRIVACY NEWS: FTC report on Internet of Things encourages companies to take measures to protect consumer privacy
    • PRIVACY NEWS: FTC staff supports allowing carriers to offer call-blocking
    • STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES: Antitrust injury central to coming appeal in LIBOR antitrust case, with implications for multiple financial markets
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Retail concrete supplier charges cement dealer with price discrimination, (Jan 27, 2015)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC
    Organizations Mentioned:Argos USVI Corp. | Spartan Concrete Products, LLC

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    A construction materials dealer engaged in price discrimination by selling cement to a retail concrete supplier at a price substantially lower than the price of cement it sold to a competing supplier over several years, according to a complaint filed ...

    By Linda O’Brien, J.D., LL.M.

    A construction materials dealer engaged in price discrimination by selling cement to a retail concrete supplier at a price substantially lower than the price of cement it sold to a competing supplier over several years, according to a complaint filed in the federal district court of St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. This pricing allegedly caused the competitor losses and eventually drove it out of business (Spartan Concrete Products, LLC v. Argos USVI, Corp., January 23, 2015).

    Argos USVI Corp., formerly known as Caricement USVI, Corp., is a construction materials dealer and was the sole wholesale distributor of cement in St. Thomas from 2010 through 2013. Spartan Concrete Products is a retail concrete contractor and supplier, formerly doing business in St. Thomas, and now based in St. Croix.

    The complaint alleges that, from 2010 to 2013, Caricement sold cement primarily, if not solely, to Spartan and competing supplier, Heavy Materials LLC. During that time, Caricement provided Heavy Materials a substantial volume discount on its purchases, which averaged approximately 10 percent on all purchases. Despite Spartan’s requests for equal pricing, Caricement refused to provide Spartan with similar discounts.

    According to the complaint, the cement sold to Spartan was “general use” and was the same grade and quality as the cement that was sold to Heavy Materials. The price discrimination was unfair and not justified by any actual cost savings, Spartan claimed. As a result of the price discrimination, Spartan, the only competitor to Heavy Materials, allegedly was driven out of the retail market, leaving St. Thomas with a single monopolistic retail cement supplier—Heavy Materials. The allegedly unfair price discrimination left St. Thomas cement consumers with fewer options.

    The plaintiff asserts claims for violations of Section 2 of the Robinson-Patman Act. The action seeks compensatory and treble damages, interest, costs of suit, attorneys’ fees, and any other just and proper relief.

    The case is No. 3:15-cv-00004-CVG-RM.

    Attorneys: Christopher Allen Kroblin (Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC) for Spartan Concrete Products, LLC.

    Companies: Spartan Concrete Products, LLC; Argos USVI Corp.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use