Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—N.D. Cal.: Consumer class certified in raw milk price fixing case
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: Ab GLIDER marketers to pay $3M civil penalty over alleged consent order violations
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: NFL’s broadcasting exemption called into question
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONFERENCES: Brand Activation Association to hold 36th Annual Marketing Law Conference
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC gets TRO against payday lender
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC’s Brill calls on Congress to boost data security enforcement tools
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—5th Cir.: Franchisees establish jurisdiction over franchisor, principals for fraudulent transfer claim
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—5th Cir.: Pro se status not required at time of EEOC filing to invoke exceptions to named-party exhaustion requirement
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—S.D.N.Y.: Limousine drivers independent contractors, not entitled to overtime pay
    • RICO—D. Kan.: Threat of “aggressive tactics” does not prove pattern of racketeering activity
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App.: Health club operator form membership contract did not violate UCL
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: Consumer’s unfair business practices claims against Uber can proceed
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.D. Cal.: HP shakes off deception claims over defective printers
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: NFL’s broadcasting exemption called into question, (Sep 18, 2014)

    Organizations Mentioned:Major League Baseball

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    With the National Football League already on the defensive in the court of public opinion and with sponsors over its handling of recent instances of player misconduct, at least one federal lawmaker is suggesting an unconventional approach to keeping ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    With the National Football League already on the defensive in the court of public opinion and with sponsors over its handling of recent instances of player misconduct, at least one federal lawmaker is suggesting an unconventional approach to keeping the NFL in line. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D., Conn.) is threatening to take away the league's “special antitrust treatment” if the NFL violates the public trust or fails to comply with “ethical and legal standards.”

    Yesterday, on the Senate floor, Blumenthal announced that he would introduce legislation to sunset the league’s antitrust exemption and to make it renewable every five years. Currently, the NFL—along with Major League Baseball, the National Basketball Association, and the National Hockey League—enjoy an antitrust exemption under the Sports Broadcasting Act when jointly marketing broadcasting rights. Blumenthal suggested that the exemption should be conditioned on the “leagues’ acting consistently with their public trust and complying with ethical and legal standards that both protect and oversee players and that keep the teams accountable to their fans.”

    “The NFL has a position of public trust because of its prominence and power, but it also has a position of public trust because of the special benefits it is accorded under the law,” according to Blumenthal. The same holds true for the NBA, MLB, and the NHL. Blumenthal pointed to the tax benefits, public subsidies, and local assistance, in addition to the antitrust exemption, received by these leagues. Thus, the senator is calling on the leagues “to do more and do better.”

    “The era of the blank check for sports teams must end,” Blumenthal remarked. “The special benefits must be dependent on the leagues’ fulfilling their positions of trust and special responsibility.”

    Blumenthal has been quite vocal lately about his dissatisfaction with the conduct of the NFL and its players. Last week, Blumenthal issued a statement, questioning the NFL’s handling of a video of Ray Rice battering his then fiancée in April. Rice, who had played for the Baltimore Ravens, was placed on indefinite suspension by the league after the video was made public. Initially, Rice was suspended for two games in light of the misconduct. When the infamous video was made public, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell had stated that the league was not in possession of the clip at the time of the initial punishment. However, questions have been raised whether the NFL had access to the video long before it was made public but failed to act.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use