Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Supreme Court Asked to Consider Scope of Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act
    • ADVERTISING—DDC: Tobacco Firms’ Obligatory Corrective Statements for Cigarette Harm, Addiction Claims Approved
    • ADVERTISING—NDCal: Settlement of Lucky Brand Jeans Text Message Advertising Class Action Preliminarily Approved
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC Contends That Drug Reformulations Can Suppress Generic Competition
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC Seeks Comment on Guides for Advertising Allowances
    • ANTITRUST—DMd: Request to Amend Certified Class of Titanium Dioxide Purchasers in Price Fixing Action Not Yet Ripe
    • ANTITRUST—WDPA: Improper Market Definition Dooms Claim of Conspiracy in Labor Market
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC Warns Hotel Operators That Price Quotes Excluding “Resort Fees” and Other Mandatory Charges May Be Deceptive
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Virginia Proposes Franchise Rule Revisions That Would Require Filing Electronic Copies of Disclosure Document
    • RICO—3rdCir: RICO Claims Against Travel Club Companies Proceed, But Claims Against Credit Card Companies Rejected
    • RICO—SDOhio: Bank’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction Granted in Check Deposit Fraud RICO Case
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES: Toys “R” Us Accused of Bait and Switch “Free Gift” Offers to Online Purchasers
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—NDIll: Insurance Agency Not Sufficiently Connected to Affiliate’s Alleged TCPA Violation for Liability
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC Contends That Drug Reformulations Can Suppress Generic Competition, (Nov 28, 2012)

    By William Zale, J.D.

    The FTC has taken the position that generic drug firm Mylan Pharmaceuticals stated a claim of unlawful exclusionary conduct under the Sherman Act by alleging that branded drug company Warner Chilcott used product reformulations to manipulate the phar ...

    By William Zale, J.D.

    The FTC has taken the position that generic drug firm Mylan Pharmaceuticals stated a claim of unlawful exclusionary conduct under the Sherman Act by alleging that branded drug company Warner Chilcott used product reformulations to manipulate the pharmaceutical regulatory system and thereby suppress generic competition. The FTC’s amicus brief dated November 21 in Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited Co. was filed in the federal district court in Philadelphia.

    The FTC maintains that, like the plaintiffs in Abbott Labs v. Teva Pharms. USA, Inc., 432 F. Supp. 2d 408, 422, 2006-1 Trade Cases ¶75,270 (D. Del. 2006), Mylan stated a plausible claim that Warner’s product reformulations constitute an unlawful means of preserving monopoly power in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act.

    The case is Civil Action No. 12-3824.

    News: Antitrust FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use