Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Oklahoma brings antitrust action against Chinese valve maker over alleged software piracy
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC testifies about actions taken to curb misleading football helmet safety claims
    • ADVERTISING—9th Cir.: Separate tests should have been applied for preliminary injunction request
    • ADVERTISING—N.D. Cal.: Consumer’s unfair business practices claims against LG, Sears fail
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Commissioner Wright calls for use of conventional antitrust principles in IP cases
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: FTC seeks comments on Service Corporation International’s application to sell certain California assets
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Japanese auto parts executives sentenced in U.S. price fixing investigation
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Senate Judiciary Committee hearing scheduled to examine Comcast-Time Warner Cable merger
    • ANTITRUST—D. Md.: Inmate’s monopoly claim against department of corrections dismissed
    • BLOG TRACKER—Noteworthy blog posts and other commentary
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: FTC, CFPB support reversal of decision on time-barred collection of debts
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Herbalife is target of FTC inquiry
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—N.D. Ga.: Dealership sale agreement would have conflicted with prior settlement with GM
    • PRIVACY NEWS: European Parliament approves data protection reform package
    • RICO—S.D.N.Y.: Real estate developers’ claims dismissed for failure to establish an enterprise
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Commissioner Wright calls for use of conventional antitrust principles in IP cases, (Mar 13, 2014)

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    Commissioner Joshua D. Wright discussed the FTC’s recent enforcement actions applying the antitrust laws to intellectual property rights (IPRs) and the agency’s policy initiatives involving IPRs at the New York City Bar Association ...

    By Jeffrey May, J.D.

    Commissioner Joshua D. Wright discussed the FTC’s recent enforcement actions applying the antitrust laws to intellectual property rights (IPRs) and the agency’s policy initiatives involving IPRs at the New York City Bar Association’s 2014 Milton Handler Lecture on March 11.

    In his remarks—entitled “Does the FTC Have a New IP Agenda?”—Wright cautioned against ad hoc antitrust analysis of IPRs. He suggested that the FTC should reaffirm the “symmetry principle” —the principle that the application of antitrust law to IPRs is in parity with the approach applied to real property. This approach is enshrined in the joint Department of Justice/FTC 1995 Guidelines on licensing IPRs, he noted.

    According to Wright, the FTC has followed the symmetry principle when considering horizontal restraints involving IPRs, reverse payment settlements, IPR licensing arrangements, deceptive conduct in the standard setting process to maintain a monopoly, and mergers involving IPRs. “[S]ymmetry provides a consistent and predictable theoretical framework for antitrust challenges involving intellectual property, just as antitrust functions for all other kinds of property,” Wright contended.

    Wright expressed his view that departures from the symmetry approach not only lack analytical support but are also potentially harmful. Wright questioned the notion that IPRs are inherently different from other property rights and, for antitrust purposes, inherently suspect.

    “[I]f there are valid reasons and evidence for departing from the symmetry principle, the FTC should be clear about the reasons for treating IPRs differently,” Wright said. “At the very least, the FTC ought to be cognizant and cautious of the departure that appears to be underway, and evaluate vigilantly whether it is the best policy going forward for the sake of competition, innovation, and consumer welfare.”

    News: Antitrust FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use