Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—S.D.N .Y: Apple denied stay pending appeal of class certification in e-books price fixing case
    • AGENCY NEWS: FTC announces new location of its Premerger Notification Office
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Antitrust Division announces agreement to remedy Bazaarvoice’s illegal acquisition of PowerReviews
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau publishes final Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guidelines
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: International Competition Network adopts predatory pricing analysis, competition assessment at annual conference
    • ANTITRUST—D.D.C.: Entry of proposed settlement in Gannett acquisition deferred to allow public comment
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—9th Cir.: Dismissal of former auto dealer’s claims against Chrysler reversed
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—Bankr. E.D. Ken.: Attorney counterclaim against franchisee client might be nondischargeable in bankruptcy
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—W. Va. Sup. Ct.: GM could "reopen" a dealership in same market without notifying existing dealer
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Assistant Director of FTC Bureau of Competition Jeffrey H. Perry will join Weil
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Competition Bureau publishes final Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guidelines, (Apr 25, 2014)

    Following a public consultation, the Canada Competition Bureau published final Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guidelines Nos. 12 and 14, the Bureau announced today. The two guidelines, along with 12 other Pre-Merger Notification Interpretatio ...

    Following a public consultation, the Canada Competition Bureau published final Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guidelines Nos. 12 and 14, the Bureau announced today. The two guidelines, along with 12 other Pre-Merger Notification Interpretation Guidelines previously published by the Bureau, assist parties and their counsel in interpreting and applying the provisions of the Competition Act relating to notifiable transactions. Concerns raised in the submissions received during the public consultation have been thoroughly considered and, where appropriate, addressed in the final guidelines.

    Final "Interpretation Guideline No. 12: Requirement to Submit a New Pre-Merger Notification and/or Advance Ruling Certificate Request Where a Proposed Transaction is Subsequently Amended" describes common amendments to proposed transactions and discusses whether such amendments would typically require parties to file a new notification and/or request for an advance ruling certificate (ARC). The guideline was revised to generally require a new notification and/or ARC request when a new or existing party to a merger increases its ownership in the target by at least 10 percent — up from 5 percent in the draft guideline. The scope of new assets that can be added to a proposed transaction without requiring a new notification or ARC request has also been broadened.

    Final "Interpretation Guideline No. 14: Duplication Arising From Transactions Between Affiliates" addresses the treatment of duplicative assets and sales revenue arising from transactions between affiliates when determining whether a proposed transaction exceeds the notification thresholds in the Act. This guideline was revised to better explain the difference between accounting duplication and notification duplication and to include more specific guidance on the situations where these two types of duplication are likely to vary most, such as transactions between a Canadian and a foreign affiliate.

    In general, the Bureau must be given advance notice of proposed transactions when the assets in Canada or revenues of the target firm generated in or from Canada exceed $82 million, and when the combined Canadian assets or revenues of the parties and their respective affiliates in, from or into Canada exceed $400 million.

    News: Antitrust

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use