Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—1st Cir.: Zipcar not liable for higher late return fees
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Austrian waste management company suspected of abusing dominance of market
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Banks that purchased or sold credit default swaps hit with Sherman Act class action
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Class action filed against providers of Vehicle Carrier Services for conspiracy to fix prices and allocate markets and customers
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Panasonic and Sanyo plead guilty in price-fixing conspiracies involving automotive parts and battery cells
    • ANTITRUST—S.D. Cal.: Indirect purchaser settlement approved in food service equipment hardware price fixing case
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: Alleged spammer agrees to settle FTC charges over “free” i-Phone text messages
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION NEWS: U.S. Postal Service job operation settles FTC charges
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—N.D. Ill.: Fax advertising seminar holders may be liable for sending unsolicited advertising
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—E.D.N.Y.: Franchisor entitled to preliminary injunction against operation of Caribbean restaurant in certain areas
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Former Network Advertising Initiative counsel Meredith Halama joins Perkins Coie
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—N.J. Sup. Ct.: Homeowners may recover attorneys’ fees and costs under New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act despite jury finding that they suffered no ascertainable loss
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ANTITRUST NEWS: Banks that purchased or sold credit default swaps hit with Sherman Act class action, (Jul 18, 2013)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Entwistle & Cappucci LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Bank of America | Bank of America Corporation | Citigroup | Citigroup, Inc. | Entwistle & Cappucci, LLP | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | HSBC Bank USA, N.A. | HSBC Bank USA, NA | HSBC Holdings PLC | HSBC Holdings Plc. | JPMorgan Chase | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Markit Group, Ltd. | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | Value Recovery Fund LLC

    By Peter Reap, J.D., LL.M.

    Value Recovery Fund LLC, individually and on behalf of a class, has filed a lawsuit in the federal district court in New York City against several “dealer Banks” on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or sold credit default ...

    By Peter Reap, J.D., LL.M.

    Value Recovery Fund LLC, individually and on behalf of a class, has filed a lawsuit in the federal district court in New York City against several “dealer Banks” on behalf of all persons and entities who purchased or sold credit default swaps (“CDS”) directly from or to the Dealer Bank defendants in the United States, or for delivery in the United States, from January 1, 2008, until such time as the alleged illegal conduct ceased. The complaint charges that the Dealer Banks violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by virtue of a continuing agreement by the Dealer Banks to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize the spreads of CDS traded on the over-the-counter market.

    The Dealer Banks named as defendants in the action are JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup, Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., HSBC Holdings Plc., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Bank of America Corporation, and Markit Group, Ltd.

    According to the complaint, the defendant Dealer Banks were the dominant dealers of CDS in the United States during the class period. Their share of CDS trading conducted within the United States ranged from approximately 97% in 2008 to over 99.6% by the first quarter of 2013.

    The Dealer Bank defendants held and continue to hold monopoly power over the trading of CDS in the United States, the suit alleges. Moreover, the defendants agreed among themselves to restrain trade and preserve their collusive control over CDS trading in the United States for the purpose of maintaining artificially wide spreads between purchase and sale prices for CDS and ensuring their continued control over the U.S. CDS trading market.

    The complaint requests permanent injunctive relief restraining the defendants from continuing their illegal conduct, damages, and attorney fees.

    The complaint in Value Recovery Fund LLC v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., Case No. 13 CIV 4928, was filed July 16, 2013.

    Attorneys: Vincent R. Cappucci (Entwistle & Cappucci LLP) for Value Recovery Fund LLC.

    Companies: Value Recovery Fund LLC; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; Citigroup, Inc.; The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.; HSBC Holdings Plc.; HSBC Bank USA, N.A.; Bank of America Corporation; Markit Group, Ltd.

    News: Antitrust NewYorkNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use