Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY: Executives indicted for water treatment chemical bid rigging conspiracy
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: EC approves acquisition of Norske Skog by Blackstone
    • ACQUISITIONS & MERGERS NEWS: FTC approves modified final order after Perrigo acquisition abandoned by Mylan
    • ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC charges Stratford Career Institute with deceptively advertising high school equivalency program
    • ADVERTISING—9th Cir.: Consumers get second shot at video game misrepresentation claims
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Deputy Assistant AG Snyder promotes individual accountability for antitrust crimes
    • ANTITRUST—E.D.N.Y.: $50M Air China settlement preliminarily approved in air cargo suit
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—D. Md.: Maryland Franchise Law claims stayed pending arbitration
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Amy Cheng receives IFA’s Crystal Compass Award
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING NEWS: FTC charges Stratford Career Institute with deceptively advertising high school equivalency program, (Feb 22, 2016)

    Organizations Mentioned:Stratford Career Institute, Inc.

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC has charged Stratford Career Institute with violating the FTC Act’s prohibition on deceptive acts by misleading consumers about its high school equivalency program, which the FTC alleges fails to meet the basic requirements of most sta ...

    By Michael Menzhuber, J.D., LL.M.

    The FTC has charged Stratford Career Institute with violating the FTC Act’s prohibition on deceptive acts by misleading consumers about its high school equivalency program, which the FTC alleges fails to meet the basic requirements of most states (FTC v. Stratford Career Institute, Inc., Case No. 1:16-cv-00371, February 18, 2016 ).

    The FTC’s complaint claims that Stratford, an online distance education school, included multiple references to a “high school diploma” in its advertisements, such as “official high school diploma”; “real high school diploma online”; and “legal high school diploma.” However, the Stratford program required only 18 credits for completion, while many states required more, including credits for classes not offered by Stratford.

    According to the agency, Stratford also advertised that its high school program would lead to (1) an increase in earning potential; (2) access to better jobs and promotions; and (3) the ability to apply for higher education. Stratford’s own records allegedly showed that consumers who tried to use a Stratford diploma were told by prospective employers and college admission officers that the program was not the same as a traditional high school.

    As a result of Stratford’s high school program falling short of its promises, thousands of students paid as much as $989 for a diploma that could not meet their educational or career needs, the complaint charged.

    Companies: Stratford Career Institute, Inc.

    News: Advertising ConsumerProtection FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use