Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—M.D. Fla.: Monopoly claims may proceed against “fully integrated” health care provider
    • ADVERTISING—C.D. Cal.: False ad claim against holder of trademarked name for heavy machinery dismissed
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Another K-Line employee charged in U.S. shipping industry probe
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Canada Supreme Court allows blocked Tervita landfill merger
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Seafood firm’s acquisition of processor allegedly would increase monopoly power
    • ANTITRUST—1st Cir.: Class of Nexium purchasers properly certified despite uninjured members
    • ANTITRUST—D. N.J.: Mylan awarded supplemental damages of $13.7M in generic Paxil case
    • CONSUMER PROTECTION—D. Nev.: Payday lenders denied immediate appeal in deceptive payday loan action
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—C.D. Cal.: Termination without notice provisions in franchise agreements barred by California policy
    • FRANCHSING & DISTRIBUTION NEWS: Ex-employees take on McDonald’s over alleged harassment by franchisee
    • LAW FIRM NEWS: Former FCC Chief of Staff Katherine Winfree joins Manatt
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—Cal. App.: California court could hear UCL claim against public utility
    • WORTH NOTING—Other Antitrust and Trade Regulation developments
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, ADVERTISING—C.D. Cal.: False ad claim against holder of trademarked name for heavy machinery dismissed, (Jan 23, 2015)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Procopio Cory Hargreaves and Savitch LLP | Squire Sanders LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Mighty Enterprises, Inc. | Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP | She Hong Industrial Company Ltd. | Squire Sanders & Dempsey

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    A heavy machinery manufacturer could not sustain a false advertising counterclaim against a heavy machinery distributor using its trade name, because the distributor had a registered federal trademark for use of the name, the federal district court i ...

    By Edward L. Puzzo, J.D.

    A heavy machinery manufacturer could not sustain a false advertising counterclaim against a heavy machinery distributor using its trade name, because the distributor had a registered federal trademark for use of the name, the federal district court in Los Angeles has ruled (Mighty Enterprises, Inc. v. She Hong Industrial Co. Ltd., January 22, 2015, Wright, O.).

    Mighty Enterprises, a distributor of heavy machinery, filed a number of claims against She Hong Industrial, a manufacturer of heavy machinery, based upon She Hong’s alleged breach of an oral agreement granting Mighty the exclusive right to distribute and service She Hong’s “Hartford” machinery in the United States. In response, She Hong made a counterclaim against Mighty alleging false advertising under the Lanham Act. Mighty moved to dismiss the counterclaim.

    False advertising. She Hong began selling its “Hartford” machinery in the U.S. in 1982. In April 2014, Mighty applied for and was granted a trademark for the use of the “Hartford” name in association with heavy machinery. She Hong claimed that Mighty’s use of the “Hartford” name it had used for many years was false advertising.

    She Hong’s claim was untenable, the court stated, because it presently did not own the rights to the Hartford trademark. A registered federal trademark was prima facie evidence of the validity of the trademark, and She Hong had admitted that Mighty owned the registered trademark. There could be no claim for false advertising against a company that advertised with a registered trademark it owned, the court stated. She Hong therefore had no basis for a Lanham Act claim, the court ruled, dismissing the counterclaim.

    The case is Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-06516-ODW(RZx).

    Attorneys: Chris M. Amantea (Squire Sanders LLP) for Mighty Enterprises, Inc. Anthony J. Dain (Procopio Cory Hargreaves and Savitch LLP) for She Hong Industrial Company Ltd.

    Companies: Mighty Enterprises, Inc.; She Hong Industrial Company Ltd.

    Cases: Advertising CaliforniaNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use