Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • House, Senate at Odds Over Bill to End CISA Shutdown
    • Anthropic Wins Court Reprieve in Lawsuit Against Trump Administration
    • Cyber Risks From Chinese Robots Gain Bicameral Attention
    • DoD Shouldn’t Use AI for Domestic Surveillance, Senate Democrats Tell Developers
    • Maine House Advances Amended Data Privacy Act
    • Robocall Fight Leads FCC to Propose Phone Number Restrictions
    • Rules to Rein in Foreign Call Centers Proposed by FCC
    • Wisconsin Senate Rejects Bill to Prohibit Equipment From ‘Foreign Adversaries’
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Wisconsin Senate Rejects Bill to Prohibit Equipment From ‘Foreign Adversaries’, (Mar 27, 2026)

    By Carrie DeLeon

    The Wisconsin state Senate has failed to pass a bill to prohibit telecommunications providers from purchasing, renting, leasing, obtaining, or maintaining critical telecommunications equipment manufactured by entities associated with foreign adversar ...

    By Carrie DeLeon

    The Wisconsin state Senate has failed to pass a bill to prohibit telecommunications providers from purchasing, renting, leasing, obtaining, or maintaining critical telecommunications equipment manufactured by entities associated with foreign adversaries. The bill passed the Assembly last month by a vote of 54-45.

    AB 683 defines “foreign adversary” in accordance with federal regulations, currently including countries such as China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela. It further specifies “foreign principal” to include governments, officials, citizens without lawful U.S. residency, business entities, investment funds, and agents linked to these adversaries.

    To ensure compliance, telecommunications providers would be required to annually certify to the Public Service Commission by Jan. 15 that they met the bill’s requirements. Providers maintaining prohibited equipment must report the geographic coordinates of such equipment, the service coverage areas affected, and submit a plan for replacement in line with federal guidelines.

    The bill (A.B. 683, Reg Sess.) is sponsored by Rep. Daniel Knodl (R.).

    News: StateLegislation DataSecurity

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use