Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • Democrats Aim to Discover Whether DOGE Plans to Combine Agency Files Into Single Database
    • 23andMe Should Obtain Consent From Each Customer for Data Sale, Court Advised
    • Bicameral Legislation Would Provide New Protections for Reproductive Health Data
    • Report on AI/ML Security Approved by FCC Council
    • SEC withdraws 14 proposals from 2022 and 2023
    • Telemarketing Bill on Agenda in Oregon Senate
    • Updates to DPO Contact Information Sought in Finland
    • Vermont Governor Signs Age-Appropriate Design Code Act Into Law
    • Websites Sanctioned for Improper Use of Tracking Pixels in Norway
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, Websites Sanctioned for Improper Use of Tracking Pixels in Norway, (Jun 13, 2025)

    By Tony Foley

    Datatilsynet, Norway’s data protection authority, has completed an investigation resulting in the issuance of sanctions against six websites for their improper use of tracking pixels.

    Tracking pixels are a technology that automatically passes i ...

    By Tony Foley

    Datatilsynet, Norway’s data protection authority, has completed an investigation resulting in the issuance of sanctions against six websites for their improper use of tracking pixels.

    Tracking pixels are a technology that automatically passes information about visitors to a website or app to a third party, including information about which websites people visit, what actions they take, and what items they place in online shopping carts.

    In a news release yesterday announcing the sanctions, Datatilsynet said all of the websites investigated made personal data acquired through the use of tracking pixels available to third parties without a legal basis in violation of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In addition, the agency’s investigation found that the websites violated their duty to inform, shared sensitive information that could indirectly disclose clues about visitors’ health, sex life, and religion and, in at least one case, shared personal data about children in vulnerable situations. The cases also revealed further practices not in line with data protection requirements, including visitors being incorrectly informed that they were anonymous when they were not, illegal disclosure of special category data to third parties, and visitors being “nudged” into consenting or receiving information that was misleading, difficult to understand or did not explain the consequence of giving consent.

    “Everyone should be able to use the Internet and find information, without being afraid of private information going astray,” said Minister of Digitalisation and Public Administration Karianne Tung. “I am therefore pleased that [Datatilsynet] supervises the use of tracking tools and what information is shared with the large technology companies."

    In the case of the website 116111.no, the site providing public services for children in vulnerable situations in the Kristiansand municipality, Datatilsynet imposed an infringement fine of 250,000 Norwegian kroner ($25,250), based primarily on its status as a public website that processed children’s data illegally. Because the purpose of the investigations was to raise awareness on the use of tracking pixels, however, Datatilsynet decided only to issue reprimands to the other sites.

    News: InternationalLegislation LitigationEnforcement DataPrivacy GDPR

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use