Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • COPYRIGHT—N.D. Cal.: Stable Diffusion’s output images are not necessarily derivative just because they copy portions of original works
    • PUBLICITY RIGHTS—N.D. Cal.: Case dismissed over photograph appearing in Netflix crime drama
    • TRADE SECRETS NEWS: IP Law firm sues former clerk for trade secret misappropriation
    • TRADE SECRETS—Tool maker wins key battle in trade secret lawsuit against rival and former employees
    • TRADEMARK—D.N.J.: Korean American business group can’t get trademark injunction over past convention
    • VITAL BRIEFINGS: Article guides rights holders though processes for maximum protection of AI-generated works
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, VITAL BRIEFINGS: Article guides rights holders though processes for maximum protection of AI-generated works, (Oct 31, 2023)

    By Thomas Long, J.D.

    Applicants seeking to register and protect copyrights in works created with the help of AI tools can take steps to clear registration hurdles under Copyright Office policies.

    As the use of artificial intelligence tools in the creative process continue ...

    By Thomas Long, J.D.

    Applicants seeking to register and protect copyrights in works created with the help of AI tools can take steps to clear registration hurdles under Copyright Office policies.

    As the use of artificial intelligence tools in the creative process continues to pick up pace, the Copyright Office has noted receiving an increasing number of copyright registration applications for works made entirely or in part with the assistance of AI. Starting from the basic premise that the Copyright Act requires human authorship of a work for it to be registrable or protectable, the Office has rejected applications in whole or in part, depending on the nature and extent of generative AI’s role in the creative process. Earlier this year, the Office published a policy statement intended to provide guidance to applicants seeking copyright protection for AI-generated works.

    A new Vital Briefings article walks through the steps of clearing the substantive and procedural hurdles set up by the Copyright Office, so applicants can have the best chance of avoiding rejections. The article describes the Office’s requirements for disclosing and disclaiming certain AI-created material, with a “how to” focus. The article also explains what to do with respect to applications already filed or registrations already issued, noting that rights holders who fail to make required corrections to the paperwork risk having applications rejected or already-issued registrations invalidated.

    The article, titled “How to clear Copyright Office hurdles to register works with AI-generated material,” is available here.

    MainStory: Copyright TechnologyInternet GCNNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use