Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PENSION AND BENEFIT PLANS—9th Cir.: Employer denied motion to compel arbitration of claims brought on behalf of retirement plan
    • BENEFITS NEWS—Senate committee highlights AI’s risks and benefits for older Americans
    • COVERAGE, LIABILITY—8th Cir.: Employees failed to show RICO scheme to evade sexual harassment judgments totaling $1.8M
    • DISCRIMINATION—DISABILITY—8th Cir.: Engineer, fired over handicap parking dispute, cannot revive claims
    • ECONOMIC NEWS—Trump delegates Defense Production Act authority to institute export restrictions on recoverable critical minerals, materials
    • EEOC NEWS—Harassment, hiring bias top latest discrimination actions
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—New York City Executive Order Signals Forthcoming Heat Illness Requirements for Employers
    • EXPERT INSIGHTS—Two Lane Highway: DOL Publishes Two ‘Dueling’ Opinion Letters Regarding the Compensability of Commute Time
    • REMEDIES, DAMAGES—N.D. Tex.: Principal’s transfer after hostile reaction to old social media posts was not adverse action, reinstatement bid denied
    • SAFETY—D. Utah: Latino workshop employees, diagnosed with silicosis, fail to establish claims against employer
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Trump levies universal minimum 10% tariff rate
    • WORTH NOTING—Cases of note dealing with wage and hour issues
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Labor & Employment Law Daily Wrap Up, VITAL BRIEFING—Trump levies universal minimum 10% tariff rate, (Jul 31, 2026)

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    International responses to the Trump administration’s forced labor tariff notice ranged from muted to cautious since it brought little change from the prevailing tariffs as rates were increased by 2.5 percent for the 53 impacted countries.

    In t ...

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    International responses to the Trump administration’s forced labor tariff notice ranged from muted to cautious since it brought little change from the prevailing tariffs as rates were increased by 2.5 percent for the 53 impacted countries.

    In this installment of Tariff Insights, Thomas Thompson reviews the fallout and various U.S. trading partner reactions resulting from the latest round of tariffs imposed by President Trump and his administration. Some of the matters Thompson explores in the article are as follows:

    • Findings from the U.S. Trade Representative, after individually investigating 60 economies’ protections against importing goods created by forced labor into their own economies, that each nation either lacked adequate legal measures or effective enforcement.

    • Mexico’s perspective that the new tariffs essentially bring no change, as exports from Mexico to the U.S. already were subject to a 10 percent tariff.

    President Trump’s warning to the European Union that substantial tariffs were in the offing as a result of it recently fining Google $1 billion for anticompetitive practices, which the president characterized as “highly unethical conduct.”

    To read the piece, click on Trump levies universal minimum 10% tariff rate.

    MainStory: EconomicNews WhiteHouseNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use