Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • COPYRIGHT—10th Cir.: Netflix escapes the clutches of Tiger King lawsuit, as court affirms summary judgment on fair use and works made for hire grounds
    • COPYRIGHT—C.D. Cal.: Shein wins partial dismissal of Brandy Melville copyright, trademark suit
    • COPYRIGHT—E.D. Mich.: Preliminary injunction denied in industrial mixer drawing dispute over failure to show likely infringement
    • COPYRIGHT—W.D. Wash.: Image licensor’s copyright infringement claims against Expedia dismissed with leave to amend
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Federal Court affirmed ineligibility of patent for vehicle monitoring technologies
    • USITC NEWS—International Trade Commission proposes rule amendments for Section 337 investigations
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Ford, GM announce they expect massive tariff refunds, both raise 2026 guidance
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, VITAL BRIEFING—Ford, GM announce they expect massive tariff refunds, both raise 2026 guidance, (May 1, 2026)

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    While the Supreme Court determined that the administration’s tariffs imposed under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to be unlawful, they were quickly replaced by “Section 122” tariffs, which are also subjec ...

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    While the Supreme Court determined that the administration’s tariffs imposed under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) to be unlawful, they were quickly replaced by “Section 122” tariffs, which are also subject to court challenges currently.

    In this installment of Tariff Insights, Thomas Thompson surveys the U.S. tariff landscape with a particular focus on recent announcements from the Ford Motor Company and General Motors where they have collectively claimed tariff refunds of $1.8 billion from the U.S. government. Some of the developments Thompson examines in the article include:

    • The significant impact anticipated tariff refunds will have on expected earnings for the major auto manufacturers, even though ongoing tariff assessments continue to have a major impact on financial performance estimates.

    • Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s view of how tariffs have impacted the consumer goods sector as measured by the personal consumption expenditures price index, and how that has informed the Fed’s Open Market Committee’s approach for adjusting the federal funds target range.

    • The Trump administration’s willingness to use tariff authorities other the IEEPA to maintain significant tariff levels for Chinese imports notwithstanding the president’s upcoming meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping later in May.

    To read the article, click Ford, GM announce they expect massive tariff refunds, both raise 2026 guidance.

    MainStory: IndustryNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use