Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • COPYRIGHT—2d Cir.: Second Circuit revives copyright claims over embedded video use
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Court affirms ITC holding that Centripetal Networks failed to establish 'technical prong' of 'domestic industry requirement' necessary for Section 337 violation
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Patent decision against Centripetal affirmed for obviousness, two claims denied on obviousness grounds reversed.
    • TRADE SECRETS—N.D. Cal.: Partial injunction granted in trade secrets case, balancing employee mobility against proprietary information protection
    • TRADEMARK—N.D. Cal.: Stock photo library states infringement claims over watermarks in AI-generated images
    • TRADEMARK—S.D.N.Y.: Permanent injunction granted to USA Weightlifting, Inc., enjoining use of protected marks
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Claimants begin tariff refund process; $166 billion at stake
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, VITAL BRIEFING—Claimants begin tariff refund process; $166 billion at stake, (Apr 24, 2026)

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    While Customs and Border Protection indicated its new payment system will handle about two-thirds of valid refund claims, the agency has yet to explain how it plans to address the remaining one-third of the claims.

    In this edition of Tariff Insights, Thomas Thompson takes a look at the recent launch of Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP’s) Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries system which seeks to provide recompense to claimants improperly levied tariffs on imports under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA) that were subsequently invalidated by U.S. Supreme Court.

    Some of the developments Thompson delves into include:

    • The relative ease of asserting a claim under the CPB’s system as described by Chicago-based Learning Resources, one of the named plaintiffs in last year’s lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s global tariffs regime that made its way to the Supreme Court.

    • Despite a smooth launch of the tariff refund system, concerns of some claimants that the Trump administration will still attempt to block the return of the funds though further appeals or other government intervention.

    • The Trump administration’s apparent willingness and desire to reassert a comprehensive tariff regime under Section 301 Trade Act of 1974, as evidenced by the government’s initiation of trade practice investigations, a prerequisite for imposing import levies under this statute.

    To read the article, click Claimants begin tariff refund process; $166 billion at stake.

    MainStory: ESGNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use