Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Administration to appeal Trump’s latest tariff defeat
    • COPYRIGHT—M.D. Pa.: Dog breeder’s use of photographer’s copyrighted images not protected under fair use
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: PTAB’s invalidation of remote control technology patent claims affirmed
    • TRADE SECRETS—N.D. Ill.: AbbVie’s trade secret claims against Chinese oncology drug developer and former employee proceed
    • TRADEMARK—N.D. Cal.: Trademark law firm liable for limited attorney fees and costs despite meritless infringement lawsuit
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: TTAB reverses refusal in ‘mermAId‘ trademark case, finding no likelihood of confusion despite similar marks
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, VITAL BRIEFING—Administration to appeal Trump’s latest tariff defeat, (May 15, 2026)

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    In arguing for a stay of the Court of International Trade’s decision pending appeals, the government asserted that it should be able to continue collecting the Section 122 tariffs it would be prohibited from collecting in the event the CIT rul ...

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    In arguing for a stay of the Court of International Trade’s decision pending appeals, the government asserted that it should be able to continue collecting the Section 122 tariffs it would be prohibited from collecting in the event the CIT ruling is upheld.

    In this installment of Tariff Insights, Thomas Thompson explores the Trump administration’s recent efforts to pursue the imposition of a global across-the-board 10 percent tariff under the Trade Act of 1974, despite a 2-1 adverse ruling from a Court of International Trade (CIT) panel. Thompson also takes look at dramatically lower U.S. beef exports to China in the past year, as well as the administration’s likely moves to provide further tariff relief for beef imported from South America.

    Some of the matters Thompson discusses in this piece include:

    • The CIT’s rationale for finding the Section 122 tariffs invalid, which turns on the meaning of the term “balance-of-payments deficits,” as well as Trade Representative Jamieson Greer’s vehement disagreement with the court’s interpretation which is driving the government’s appellate challenge.

    • Prior actions from the Trump administration to increase the supply and reduce tariffs on South American beef, which have had little impact as U.S. beef prices continue to reach record price levels.

    • Objections from U.S. cattle ranchers and their representatives in Congress to provide additional tariff relief to Argentinian and Brazilian beef producers, which have resulted in the president delaying future executive orders on the topic.

    To read the article, click Administration to appeal Trump’s latest tariff defeat.

    MainStory: TopStory StrategicPerspectives ESGNews GCNNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use