Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • COPYRIGHT—1st Cir.: Songwriter’s copyright lawsuit against Ricky Martin over the song 'Vida' revived on appeal
    • COPYRIGHT—S.D. Fla.: Too early to evaluate fair use factors in aerial photo case
    • TRADEMARK—7th Cir.: District court’s cancellation of clothing company’s 'This We’ll Defend' trademark registration upheld
    • TRADEMARK—S.D.N.Y.: Amazon Studios, Paramount secure dismissal of trademark lawsuit over ‘The Love Zone’ mark
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: Refusal to register 'PROSCIUTTO DI CARPEGNA' mark for Italian ham products affirmed
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Administration slow walking tariff refunds; $23 billion paid out, $143 billion remains outstanding
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, VITAL BRIEFING—Administration slow walking tariff refunds; $23 billion paid out, $143 billion remains outstanding, (Jun 15, 2026)

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    President Trump warned litigation was coming the day the Supreme Court handed down its IEEPA decision finding the administration’s tariffs to be illegal. As he explained to reporters, “We’ll end up being in court for the next fiv ...

    By Brad Rosen, J.D.

    President Trump warned litigation was coming the day the Supreme Court handed down its IEEPA decision finding the administration’s tariffs to be illegal. As he explained to reporters, “We’ll end up being in court for the next five years.”

    In this installment of Tariff Insights, Thomas Thompson examines the Trump administration’s apparent willingness to continue litigation and challenge legitimate claims filed by exporters seeking tariff refunds called for by the Supreme Court’s ruling in V.O.S. Selections v. Trump, decided in February of this year.

    Some of the matters Thompson discusses in the article include:

    • Indications from government attorneys that the administration will appeal a Court of International Trade (CIT) order that lets all potential claimants seek refunds of tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court without individually suing the government.

    • The growing disparity and inequity between large and small importers in connection with processing of tariff refund claims, as well as the government’s Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) platform’s current inability to address such claims.

    • A direction from a CIT judge to government attorneys representing Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to pay back all wrongfully imposed duties, which now reflects potential claims for nearly $50 billion in refunds for liquidated tariffs.

    To read the piece, click on Administration slow walking tariff refunds; $23 billion paid out, $143 billion remains outstanding.

    MainStory: IndustryNewsTrends

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use