Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • Congressional Efforts to Resurrect Surveillance Law Derailed by Trump
    • Legislation to Strengthen Data Privacy Law Advances in Delaware
    • Privacy Risk of ‘Shadow AI’ Prompts Warning in Europe
    • Proposed Undersea Cable Security Rules Need Tweaking, FCC Told
    • Slovenia Clarifies Difference Between Data Pseudonymization, Anonymization
    • Stronger Privacy Protections for Children Advance in California
    • Toy Drones Removed From FCC’s ‘Covered List’
    • U.K. Regulators Comment on Proposed Social Media Ban for Kids
    • Vermont Governor Signs Bill to Overhaul Data Broker Regulations
    • Vermont Governor Signs Consumer Data Privacy Bill
    • Views Sought by FCC on Drone Security
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Cybersecurity Policy Report, U.K. Regulators Comment on Proposed Social Media Ban for Kids, (Jun 17, 2026)

    By Tony Foley and Lynn Stanton

    The United Kingdom’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a statement on the U.K. government’s recent announcement regarding a ban on access to social media platforms by children under age 16.

    In the statement, ICO s ...

    By Tony Foley and Lynn Stanton

    The United Kingdom’s Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued a statement on the U.K. government’s recent announcement regarding a ban on access to social media platforms by children under age 16.

    In the statement, ICO said that keeping children safe online was one of its top priorities, adding that its response to a government consultation on “growing up in an online world” sets out its plans to ensure that social media platforms are blocking underage users on their platforms under U.K. data protection law. It cited enforcement actions against Reddit and Imgur, as well as its Children's Code strategy as further evidence of its work in the area of children’s online protection.

    “We will continue to engage with government, as well as other regulators, to ensure that any legislative changes deliver robust protection for children online,” the statement concludes. “Whilst government develops its plans, the existing law still applies, and organisations should be clear that their data protection obligations remain.”

    Meanwhile, the U.K.’s Office of Communications (Ofcom) informed the Department of Science, Innovation, and Technology in a letter yesterday that, in addressing age-verification for users under 16, it was aware that it had “more work to do to understand the effectiveness and accessibility of different methods, the availability of identity and age attributes at 16, and the privacy considerations of different existing and emerging methods.”

    It added that the evidence from Australia, where a similar ban is in place, “does not yet show that [age-inference] models can deliver an effective, privacy-preserving solution for an under 16 ban.”

    News: InternationalLegislation DataPrivacy

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use