Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • TRADE SECRETS—Fla. App.: Auto rental company’s trade secret liability upheld; $864,000 award reduced
    • COPYRIGHT—N.D.N.Y.: Video mocking youth baseball program deemed fair use
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • COPYRIGHT—S.D. Ohio: Court rejects vocalist’s claim to featured artist royalties from Zapp recordings
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Lower court order on Rule 11 motion inadequate for review
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: PTAB properly found twist-drill patent claims unpatentable as obvious
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: Refusal to register HANSEN HONEY FARM for honey and related products affirmed
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • VITAL BRIEFING—Déjà vu, Trump’s forced labor tariffs in the docket
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—TTAB: Refusal to register HANSEN HONEY FARM for honey and related products affirmed, (Oct 2, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:GottardoLaw LLC
    Organizations Mentioned:Hansen Honey Farm

    By Carolin Dennis, B.Sc., LL.B., LL.M.

    TTAB affirmed the refusal to register the applicant’s proposed mark citing widespread recognition of the proposed mark as a surname without a showing of acquired distinctiveness as to the surname.

    In a non-precedential decision, the Trademark T ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use