Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TRADEMARK—D. Ariz.: Polish start-up company’s suit against GEICO moves forward
    • COPYRIGHT NEWS—House bill would modernize copyright registration of visual works
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—N.D. Ill.: Motorola preserves induced infringement claims against Hytera over two-way radio technology
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—E.D. Cal.: British software provider establishes prior use of ‘CLAIMABLE’ but common-law service-mark rights not enforceable
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—N.D. Ill.: Injunctive relief granted to a pizza franchisor restricting the geographic scope of use of the Ledo Pizza mark
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: Likelihood of confusion warrants cancellation of registration for standard character mark THE REMNANT
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—TTAB: Likelihood of confusion warrants cancellation of registration for standard character mark THE REMNANT, (Oct 21, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:DuFault Law Firm, P.C. | Ioliberum Law Firm, P.C.
    Organizations Mentioned:New Life Worship Center, Inc. | The Remnant, Inc.

    By Nadine E. Roddy, J.D.

    The competing marks, used for religious and spiritual purposes, were essentially identical, and the parties’ goods and services were closely related.

    The holder of alleged common law rights in the marks THE REMNANT and REMNANT TV demonstrated a ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use