Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PATENT—D. Mass.: Moderna sues Pfizer/BioNTech for patent infringement in developing COVID vaccine
    • COPYRIGHT—C.D. Cal.: Pandora’s royalty policies are no joke to comedian George Lopez
    • PATENT—E.D. Ark.: Summary judgment of non-infringement granted in potting soil dispute.
    • PATENT—Fed. Cir.: Radiation therapy patent claims ruled invalid based on obviousness
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: BLACK BIRTHING BILL OF RIGHTS was registrable because used as a mark
    • TRADEMARK—TTAB: Registration of mark for character in cartel television show refused
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADEMARK—TTAB: BLACK BIRTHING BILL OF RIGHTS was registrable because used as a mark, (Aug 26, 2022)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Berdinis Law PC
    Organizations Mentioned:National Association to Advance Black Birth

    By Kevin M. Finson, J.D.

    The proposed mark, BLACK BIRTHING BILL OF RIGHTS, was registerable because it was used as a mark to identify the services of promotion of Black maternal and infant health care.

    A proposed mark was used as a source indicator, the Trademark Trial and Ap ...

    By Kevin M. Finson, J.D.

    The proposed mark, BLACK BIRTHING BILL OF RIGHTS, was registerable because it was used as a mark to identify the services of promotion of Black maternal and infant health care.

    A proposed mark was used as a source indicator, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board has held. The mark, as used on the specimens provided, would be associated with the registrant and its promotion of Black maternal and infant care. As a result, the Board reversed the refusal to register (In re National Association to Advance Black Birth, August 23, 2022, Shaw, T.).

    The National Association to Advance Black Birth (NAABB) sought registration of the standard character mark BLACK BIRTHING BILL OF RIGHTS on the Principal Register for use with services including “Promoting public awareness of the rights and needs of Black women and birthing persons in connection with maternal and postpartum care by means of public advocacy” in International Class 35. The Examining Attorney refused registration on the grounds that the proposed mark failed to function as a mark and that the specimens provided did not show the mark in use in commerce in connection with the identified services.

    Use as a mark. The Examining Attorney argued that the phrase BLACK BIRTHING BILL OF RIGHTS was informational, used in connection with a list of rights Black women should expect to receive. NAABB argued that it used the phrase on its specimens as a way to advocate and increase awareness. TTAB held that the mark was used in rendering the identified services and acted as an identifier of NAABB as the source of those services. The mark was used on Instagram posts and other resources to identify NAABB. This use with the provision of the specified services was “in commerce.” Accordingly, the Board reversed the refusal to register.

    The case is Serial No. 90581377.

    Attorneys: Michele Berdinis (Berdinis Law PC) for National Association to Advance Black Birth. Kim Teresa for the USPTO.

    Companies: National Association to Advance Black Birth

    Cases: Trademark USPTO

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use