Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations
    • COPYRIGHT NEWS—European Advocate General: AI training can fall within copyright exception
    • PATENT—D. Del.: Tir Technologies' motion for clarification and reargument granted in r streaming technology patent dispute granted
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—D. Md.: Semiconductor memory device IPRs affirmed after appeals by Micron, Intel
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—5th Cir.: District court erred in finding no likelihood of confusion with ‘Casa Azul’ tequila
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—5th Cir.: Publishing agreement defeats board game developer’s infringement claims
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADEMARK—D. Mass.: Insurance comparison platforms must face infringement claims over ‘JERRY’ trademark
      • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
    • Articles
  • Law Firms
    • Law Firms
  • Organizations
    • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADE SECRETS—D. Md.: Semiconductor memory device IPRs affirmed after appeals by Micron, Intel, (Nov 5, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Kramon & Graham, P.A. | Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
    Organizations Mentioned:Compass Pathfinder Ltd. | Terran Biosciences, Inc.

    By Jonathan Anderson

    Micron and Intel alleged that the subject claims would have been obvious over prior art at the time of the invention.

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed two inter partes review (IPR) final written decisions by the U.S. Patent T ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use