Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • PATENT—D. Del.: Netflix must face infringement claims involving video caching and streaming patents
    • COPYRIGHT—S.D.N.Y.: Content owners win another default judgment over a pirate library
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • PATENT—9th Cir.: Manufacturer of Exparel anesthetic gets mixed results under an assignment agreement
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—8th Cir.: Seed supplier’s trade secret verdict upheld, but attorney fee award vacated
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—N.D. Cal.: Court grants preliminary injunction only to trade secret described with 'sufficient particularity'
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • TRADE SECRETS—W.D. La.: Preliminary injunction granted in oil well-intervention services case
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
    • WORTH NOTING—Other IP law developments
    • You have 1 more complimentary views available this month. Log in if you are already a customer
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    IP Law Daily, TRADE SECRETS—8th Cir.: Seed supplier’s trade secret verdict upheld, but attorney fee award vacated, (Nov 10, 2026)

    Law Firms Mentioned:Baker & Donelson | Littler Mendelson P.C.
    Organizations Mentioned:Wilbur-Ellis Co., LLC

    By Saurabh Kashyap, B.A., M.A., LL.B., LL.M.

    A former sales representative’s use of confidential customer information supported the damages award, but the district court failed to consider the supplier’s limited monetary recovery when calculating attorney fees.

    A former agricultura ...

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use