Go to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.comGo to Wolters Kluwer VitalLaw.com
VitalLaw®
  • Find answers to your questions
  • Log in to access your subscriptions
In depth. On point.
In depth. On point.
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
  • Home
  • Legal Directory
In depth. On point.
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations
    • TOP STORY—Proposed Amendments to Premerger Notification Rules Would Set Procedures for Withdrawal of Filings
    • ADVERTISING—CalCtApp: Class Certification Denied in California False Advertising, Unfair Trade Practices Suit Against Pest Control Company
    • ADVERTISING—NDCal: Nutritional Supplement Purchaser Fails to Plead California False Advertising Claims over Immune System Benefit Statements
    • ADVERTISING—SDNY: Low-Cost Vitamin, Supplement Maker Found Liable for False Advertising, Ordered to Pay Over $11.6 Million
    • ANTITRUST NEWS: Justice Department Comments on FERC’s Proposed Natural Gas Market Transparency Rules
    • ANTITRUST—EDNY: Conspiracy, Monopoly Claims Against Chrysler, Licensing Agent Fail
    • CONFERENCES: American Bar Association to Hold 61st Antitrust Law Spring Meeting in April
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—EDNY: Failure to Purchase Gasoline, Pay Rent, Operate 24-Hours Per Day Justified Termination of Franchise
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRIBUTION—SDNY: ExxonMobil’s Termination of Gasoline Dealer Did Not Violate Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
    • FRANCHISING & DISTRUTION—EDMich: Oil Change Business Franchisee Violated Noncompete Covenant by Allowing Competing Business to Occupy Former Franchise Location
    • INDUSTRY NEWS: Kirsch, Gilbert Join Gray Plant Mooty’s Franchise & Distribution Practice
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—11thCir: Florida Little FTC Act Claims over Lunch Meat Advertising Barred
    • STATE UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES—EDLa: Fan Unable to Pursue Claims Against NFL for Sanctions Imposed on Saints Players, Coaches
  • Articles
  • Articles
  • Law Firms
  • Law Firms
  • Organizations
  • Organizations

    Antitrust Law Daily Wrap Up, TOP STORY—Proposed Amendments to Premerger Notification Rules Would Set Procedures for Withdrawal of Filings, (Feb 4, 2013)

    Organizations Mentioned:Bureau of Competition

    By E. Darius Sturmer, J.D.

    The FTC has proposed amendments to its premerger notification rules. The changes, announced February 1, would establish procedures for the withdrawal of a Hart Scott Rodino (HSR) premerger notification filing in certain circumstances, and are aimed a ...

    By E. Darius Sturmer, J.D.

    The FTC has proposed amendments to its premerger notification rules. The changes, announced February 1, would establish procedures for the withdrawal of a Hart Scott Rodino (HSR) premerger notification filing in certain circumstances, and are aimed at helping the FTC and Department of Justice “make efficient use of scarce agency resources.”

    The proposed rules formalize the long-standing position of the FTC’s Premerger Notification Office regarding the withdrawal of an HSR filing, as well as the withdrawal and refiling of an HSR filing without paying an additional fee. The “withdraw and refile” procedure, entirely under the control of HSR filers, allows additional time to review a transaction during the initial waiting period, thus potentially avoiding a costly second request. This procedure has been used informally for 30 years and the Commission believes that making it part of the HSR rules will make it more effective and useful for filing parties.

    The proposed rules also establish a procedure for the automatic withdrawal of an HSR filing when filings are made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announcing that a transaction has been terminated.

    “The proposed rule has been narrowly crafted to create consistency in the treatment of a transaction based upon the parties’ official statements to the SEC regarding a transaction’s viability,” said Richard Feinstein, Director of the Bureau of Competition. “As a result, we will be better able to allocate our resources and, in the rare instances that this procedure is invoked, the public interest will be served.”

    Under the HSR Act, the FTC and the Department of Justice review most of the proposed transactions that affect commerce in the United States and are over a certain size to ensure that they do not substantially lessen competition. The law requires that companies file premerger reports with the agencies and wait a specified period before completing such transactions.

    The FTC is seeking public comments on the proposed amendments. Comments must be received on or before April 15, 2013. They can be filed online or sent to: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex H), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20580.

    A concurring statement by Commissioner Joshua D. Wright backed the proposed changes based on his belief that the agency would benefit from the public’s input into the proposed rulemaking. However, Wright expressed concern that the proposed rules may impose costs in excess of any potential benefits. If adopted, he argued, “they could increase the costs of corporate takeovers and thus distort the market for corporate control.” The proposed rules “could also create incentives for firms to structure their transactions less efficiently and discourage the use of tender offers.” Finally, he contended, the proposed new rules would disproportionately burden U.S. public companies, as they would not apply to tender offers for many non-public and foreign companies.

    MainStory: TopStory Antitrust FederalTradeCommissionNews

    © 2026 CCH Incorporated and its affiliates and licensors. All rights reserved.

    • Manage Cookie Preferences
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Use